• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微核试验与美国国家毒理学计划啮齿动物致癌物:假阴性情况并不多。

The micronucleus test and NTP rodent carcinogens: not so many false negatives.

作者信息

Galloway S M

机构信息

Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA 19486, USA.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1996 Jun 10;352(1-2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00225-1.

DOI:10.1016/0027-5107(95)00225-1
PMID:8676909
Abstract

In the study by Shelby et al. (1993) on 49 chemicals, the results of the micronucleus (MN) test in mouse bone marrow were compared with the results of the 2 year rodent carcinogenicity assays. Seven of the 25 rodent carcinogens were considered positive in the MN test, 5 following a protocol in which chemicals were given in three daily doses, and a further 2 when the chemical was administered only once. This low rate of positive results has led to disappointment in the MN test as a screen for carcinogens, but a careful examination of the data and of its analysis by Shelby et al. (1993) shows that many of the negative results are appropriate because: of the 18 carcinogens that were negative in the MN test, 1 has been retested and found to be non-carcinogenic, 9 were non-genotoxic and at least 2 were site-of-contact carcinogens not expected to be detected in the bone marrow. Two others were clearly positive in the MN test in other labs. Thus, the MN test 'missed' not 18 carcinogens, but 4 genotoxic carcinogens. The significance of these 4 needs further assessment, since three were liver specific carcinogens and the fourth was a very weak inducer of hemangiosarcomas in female mice only. Overall, the results of Shelby et al. (1993) do not cast such a shadow on the micronucleus test as many feared, and must be examined in the context of all the information available on each chemical. As Ashby and Tinwell emphasize in the accompanying article and in Tinwell and Ashby (1994), the data show that the MN test is capable of identifying human carcinogens and rodent germ cell mutagens, and remains a useful part of genotoxicity evaluation of chemicals.

摘要

在谢尔比等人(1993年)对49种化学物质的研究中,将小鼠骨髓微核(MN)试验的结果与两年期啮齿动物致癌性试验的结果进行了比较。25种啮齿动物致癌物中有7种在MN试验中被判定为阳性,其中5种是按照化学品每日分三次给药的方案进行试验的,另外2种是仅给药一次的情况下判定为阳性的。如此低的阳性率使得人们对MN试验作为致癌物筛选方法感到失望,但是仔细审查谢尔比等人(1993年)的数据及其分析可以发现,许多阴性结果是合理的,原因如下:在MN试验中呈阴性的18种致癌物中,1种经过重新检测后发现无致癌性,9种无基因毒性,至少2种是接触部位致癌物,预计在骨髓中无法检测到。另外两种在其他实验室的MN试验中明显呈阳性。因此,MN试验“遗漏”的不是这18种致癌物,而是4种基因毒性致癌物。这4种致癌物的意义需要进一步评估,因为其中3种是肝脏特异性致癌物,第4种仅在雌性小鼠中是血管肉瘤的非常弱的诱导剂。总体而言,谢尔比等人(1993年)的结果并没有像许多人担心的那样给微核试验蒙上阴影,必须结合每种化学物质的所有现有信息来审视这些结果。正如阿什比和廷韦尔在随附文章以及廷韦尔和阿什比(1994年)中所强调的,数据表明MN试验能够识别人类致癌物和啮齿动物生殖细胞诱变剂,并且仍然是化学品遗传毒性评估的一个有用部分。

相似文献

1
The micronucleus test and NTP rodent carcinogens: not so many false negatives.微核试验与美国国家毒理学计划啮齿动物致癌物:假阴性情况并不多。
Mutat Res. 1996 Jun 10;352(1-2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00225-1.
2
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.一组三项体外遗传毒性试验鉴别啮齿动物致癌物和非致癌物能力的评估I. 敏感性、特异性和相对预测性
Mutat Res. 2005 Jul 4;584(1-2):1-256. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004.
3
The rodent bone marrow micronucleus assay: contrast between its sensitivity to human carcinogens and its insensitivity to NTP rodent carcinogens.啮齿动物骨髓微核试验:其对人类致癌物的敏感性与对美国国家毒理学计划啮齿动物致癌物的不敏感性之间的对比。
Mutat Res. 1996 Jun 10;352(1-2):181-4. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00224-3.
4
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.一组三项体外遗传毒性试验鉴别啮齿类致癌物和非致癌物能力的评估II. 哺乳动物细胞结果、相对预测性及肿瘤谱的进一步分析
Mutat Res. 2006 Sep 19;608(1):29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.017.
5
Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?长期生物测定得出的肿瘤发生率能告诉我们关于致癌物我们需要了解的信息吗?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;41(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.11.001. Epub 2004 Dec 19.
6
Collaborative study on fifteen compounds in the rat-liver Comet assay integrated into 2- and 4-week repeat-dose studies.在为期 2 周和 4 周的重复剂量研究中,将大鼠肝彗星试验中的 15 种化合物进行联合研究。
Mutat Res. 2010 Sep 30;702(1):40-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
7
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo.一组三项体外遗传毒性试验鉴别啮齿类致癌物和非致癌物能力的评估III. 体内的适当后续测试
Mutat Res. 2008 Jul 31;654(2):114-32. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 May 16.
8
Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.致突变性和遗传毒理学中的测试策略:对欧洲化妆品和非食品产品科学委员会染发剂评估指南的评价。
Mutat Res. 2005 Dec 30;588(2):88-105. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Dec 2.
9
The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.果蝇检测结果作为接触致癌物指标的情况。
IARC Sci Publ. 1999(146):427-70.
10
Failure of the standard battery of short-term tests in detecting some rodent and human genotoxic carcinogens.短期标准检测组合在检测某些啮齿动物和人类遗传毒性致癌物方面的失败。
Toxicology. 2004 Mar 1;196(1-2):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2003.11.003.