López-Olaondo L, Carrascosa F, Pueyo F J, Monedero P, Busto N, Sáez A
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;76(6):835-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.6.835.
We studied 100 ASA I-II females undergoing general anaesthesia for major gynaecological surgery, in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Patients received one of four regimens for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): ondansetron 4 mg (n = 25), dexamethasone 8 mg (n = 25), ondansetron with dexamethasone (4 mg and 8 mg, respectively, n = 25) or placebo (saline, n = 25) There were no differences in background factors or factors related to operation and anaesthesia, morphine consumption, pain or side effects between groups. The incidence of nausea and emetic episodes in the ondansetron with dexamethasone group was lower than in the placebo (P < 0.01), ondansetron (P < 0.05) and dexamethasone (P = 0.057) groups. There were no differences between ondansetron and dexamethasone, and both were more effective than placebo (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Dexamethasone appeared to be preferable in preventing nausea than emetic episodes. Fewer patients in the ondansetron with dexamethasone group needed antimetic rescue (P < 0.01 vs placebo and P < 0.05 vs ondansetron). We conclude that prophylactic administration of combined ondansetron and dexamethasone is effective in preventing PONV.
在一项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究中,我们研究了100例接受全身麻醉进行大型妇科手术的ASA I-II级女性患者。患者接受四种预防术后恶心呕吐(PONV)方案之一:昂丹司琼4毫克(n = 25)、地塞米松8毫克(n = 25)、昂丹司琼与地塞米松联合使用(分别为4毫克和8毫克,n = 25)或安慰剂(生理盐水,n = 25)。各组之间在背景因素、与手术和麻醉相关的因素、吗啡用量、疼痛或副作用方面没有差异。昂丹司琼与地塞米松联合使用组的恶心和呕吐发作发生率低于安慰剂组(P < 0.01)、昂丹司琼组(P < 0.05)和地塞米松组(P = 0.057)。昂丹司琼和地塞米松之间没有差异,且两者均比安慰剂更有效(分别为P < 0.05和P < 0.01)。地塞米松在预防恶心方面似乎比预防呕吐发作更可取。昂丹司琼与地塞米松联合使用组需要抗呕吐救援的患者较少(与安慰剂相比P < 0.01,与昂丹司琼相比P < 0.05)。我们得出结论,预防性联合使用昂丹司琼和地塞米松可有效预防PONV。