Jelinek T, peyerl G, Löscher T, Nothdurft H D
Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University of Munich, Germany.
Z Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;34(4):237-40.
Diagnosis of giardiasis relies largely on the microscopical detection of trophozoites or cysts in feces. However, this method is labour- and time-intensive and depends highly on the skill of an experienced microscopist. In order to identify the prevalence of Giardia lamblia in travellers returning from overseas, we evaluated sensitivity and specificity of a commercially available ELISA kit for the detection of Giardia-lamblia-antigen in stool. Nine hundred seventy-eight stool samples from 795 patients were examined by microscopy (iron-hematoxyilin-stain, SAF-concentration) and ELISA. Altogether, Giardia infection could be detected in 74 subjects. On evaluation of all samples, the ELISA turned out to be more sensitive than microscopy (95.5% vs. 81.8%) and 99.7% specific for Giardia lamblia. Especially with microscopy, the examination of more than one stool specimen did improve diagnostic sensitivity. It seems therefore advisable to retain the practise of examining at least three stool samples before considering a patient as not infected. The coproantigen-ELISA is especially advantageous in situations where only a single stool sample can be examined. It should not, however, replace microscopical examination of stool specimens for ova and parasites since other potential pathogens would otherwise escape detection.
贾第虫病的诊断很大程度上依赖于粪便中滋养体或包囊的显微镜检测。然而,这种方法既耗费人力又耗时,并且高度依赖经验丰富的显微镜技师的技能。为了确定从海外归来的旅行者中蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫的感染率,我们评估了一种市售酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试剂盒检测粪便中蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫抗原的敏感性和特异性。通过显微镜检查(铁苏木精染色、蔗糖溶液漂浮浓缩法)和ELISA对795例患者的978份粪便样本进行了检测。总共在74名受试者中检测到贾第虫感染。对所有样本进行评估后发现,ELISA比显微镜检查更敏感(95.5%对81.8%),对蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫的特异性为99.7%。特别是在显微镜检查中,检查多份粪便标本确实提高了诊断敏感性。因此,在将患者视为未感染之前,似乎建议保留至少检查三份粪便样本的做法。在只能检查一份粪便样本的情况下,粪便抗原ELISA特别有利。然而,它不应该取代对粪便标本进行的虫卵和寄生虫显微镜检查,否则其他潜在病原体将无法被检测到。