Klauser A G, Voderholzer W A, Schindlbeck N E, Müller-Lissner S A
Department of Gastroenterology, University of Munich, Germany.
Z Gastroenterol. 1996 May;34(5):273-8.
The first aim of the study was to find a cause of symptoms in patients suffering from "irritable bowel syndrome" using diagnostic tests aimed at functional disorders of lower gut. A second aim was to test, whether the presence of irritable bowel syndrome (or, synonymously, absence of classic organic disease) can be predicted by specific symptoms. 134 consecutive patients (50 +/- 16 SD years, range 17 to 88, 94 women) presenting in our gastroenterological outpatient department with abdominal pain and altered bowel habits were included. A conventional diagnostic work-up aimed at classic organic diseases and, if negative, a functional diagnostic work-up aimed at gastrointestinal malfunction such as dietary fibre trial, functional proctoscopy, defecography, colonic transit of radiopaque markers, anorectal manometry, and lactose tolerance test were done. A classic organic disease was found in only 15 of 134 patients by conventional diagnostic tests. Functional diagnostic work-up yielded a diagnosis in 70 of the remaining 119 patients that else would have been labeled to suffer from IBS (25 slow transit constipation, 20 disordered defecation, nine low fibre intake, and nine lactose intolerance among them). When symptoms were evaluated with a standardized questionnaire, "constipation" and the "necessity of straining to open bowels" were very specific for functional bowel disorder (92% and 100%), but sensitivity of both symptoms was only about 60%. The so-called "Manning criteria" had a very low prevalence in our sample and so were not discriminatory. Since in more than half of the patients with "irritable bowel syndrome" a specific diagnosis can be reached, functional tests should be considered in such patients. The symptom "constipation" in patients with lower gut complaints predicted a functional disorder rather than a classic organic disease with a high specificity.
该研究的首要目标是,通过针对下消化道功能紊乱的诊断测试,找出患有“肠易激综合征”患者症状的病因。第二个目标是测试特定症状能否预测肠易激综合征的存在(或者同义地,经典器质性疾病的不存在)。纳入了134例连续就诊于我院胃肠科门诊、有腹痛和排便习惯改变的患者(年龄50±16标准差岁,范围17至88岁,94例女性)。进行了针对经典器质性疾病的常规诊断检查,若结果为阴性,则进行针对胃肠道功能障碍的功能性诊断检查,如膳食纤维试验、功能性直肠镜检查、排粪造影、不透X线标志物的结肠转运、肛门直肠测压和乳糖耐量试验。通过常规诊断测试,134例患者中仅15例发现有经典器质性疾病。功能性诊断检查在其余119例患者中的70例得出了诊断结果,否则这些患者会被诊断为患有肠易激综合征(其中25例为慢传输型便秘,20例为排便障碍,9例膳食纤维摄入量低,9例乳糖不耐受)。当用标准化问卷评估症状时,“便秘”和“排便时需用力”对功能性肠病具有很高的特异性(分别为92%和100%),但这两种症状的敏感性仅约为60%。所谓的“曼宁标准”在我们的样本中患病率很低,因此没有鉴别力。由于超过半数的“肠易激综合征”患者能够得出特定诊断,因此对于此类患者应考虑进行功能性检查。下消化道不适患者的“便秘”症状以高特异性预测功能性疾病而非经典器质性疾病。