Suppr超能文献

紧张症。一、评定量表与标准化检查。

Catatonia. I. Rating scale and standardized examination.

作者信息

Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, Dowling F, Francis A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, SUNY Stony Brook, USA.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 Feb;93(2):129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb09814.x.

Abstract

To facilitate the systematic description of catatonic signs, we developed a catatonia rating examination, rating scale and screening instrument. We constructed a 23-item rating scale and a truncated 14-item screening instrument using operationalized definitions of signs ascribed to catatonia in published sources. Inter-rater reliability was tested in 44 simultaneous ratings of 28 cases defined by the presence of > or = 2 signs on the 14-item screen. Inter-rater reliability for total score on the rating scale was 0.93, and mean agreement of items was 88.2% (SD 9.9). Inter-rater reliability for total score on the screening instrument was 0.95, and mean agreement of items was 92.7% (SD 4.9). Diagnostic agreement was high based on criteria for catatonia put forth by other authors. Seven per cent (15/215) of consecutively admitted patients to an academic psychiatric in-patient facility met criteria for catatonia. It is concluded that catatonia is a distinct, moderately prevalent neuropsychiatric syndrome. The rating scale and screening instrument are reliable and valid. Their use facilitates diagnosis, treatment protocols, and cross-study comparisons.

摘要

为便于对紧张症体征进行系统描述,我们开发了一种紧张症评定检查、评定量表和筛查工具。我们根据已发表资料中归因于紧张症的体征的操作性定义,构建了一个包含23个条目的评定量表和一个简化的包含14个条目的筛查工具。在对14个条目筛查中存在≥2个体征所定义的28例病例进行的44次同步评定中,检验了评定者间信度。评定量表总分的评定者间信度为0.93,各条目的平均一致性为88.2%(标准差9.9)。筛查工具总分的评定者间信度为0.95,各条目的平均一致性为92.7%(标准差4.9)。根据其他作者提出的紧张症标准,诊断一致性较高。一家学术性精神科住院机构连续收治的患者中有7%(15/215)符合紧张症标准。结论是,紧张症是一种独特的、中度常见的神经精神综合征。评定量表和筛查工具可靠且有效。它们的使用便于诊断、治疗方案制定以及跨研究比较。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验