Allen M L, DiMarino A J
Division of Gastroenterology, Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Jul;41(7):1346-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02088558.
There are no requirements concerning the amplitude of simultaneous contractions among the present criteria for the manometric diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the current criteria effectively identify an appropriately homogenous patient population. Sixty consecutive motility tracings that met the criteria for diffuse esophageal spasm were evaluated. A bimodal distribution of the highest simultaneous esophageal contraction for each patient was observed. One group's (N = 29) highest simultaneous esophageal contractile amplitude was < or = 74 mm Hg, the other's (N = 31) highest simultaneous esophageal contractile amplitude was > or = 100 mm Hg. Group 1 had significantly decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, lower peristaltic amplitude, more aperistalsis, fewer simultaneous contractions, and fewer complaints of chest pain. These comparisons suggest that consideration be given to the amplitude of simultaneous esophageal contractions in the manometric diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm.
在目前弥漫性食管痉挛的测压诊断标准中,对于同步收缩的幅度没有要求。本研究的目的是确定当前标准是否能有效识别出适当的同质患者群体。对连续60份符合弥漫性食管痉挛标准的动力描记图进行了评估。观察到每位患者食管同步收缩最高值呈双峰分布。一组(N = 29)食管同步收缩最高幅度≤74 mmHg,另一组(N = 31)食管同步收缩最高幅度≥100 mmHg。第1组食管下括约肌压力显著降低,蠕动幅度降低,无蠕动更多,同步收缩更少,胸痛主诉也更少。这些比较表明,在弥漫性食管痉挛的测压诊断中应考虑食管同步收缩的幅度。