Beumer R R, te Giffel M C, Kok M T, Rombouts F M
Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Jun;22(6):448-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb01200.x.
All confirmation and identification methods used in this study can be used for the screening of suspected colonies on isolation media for Listeria spp. In traditional enrichment procedures the Microscreen Listeria latex test gives fast results. The DNA probes (Accuprobe and Gene-Trak) are very specific in detecting Listeria monocytogenes. For identification of Listeria spp. both tests (API and Micro-ID) performed equally well. Preference may be given to the API test, since differentiation of L. monocytogenes from L. innocua is based on the absence of arylamidase, through which tests for haemolytic activity and/or CAMP reactions can be omitted. However, the use of Enhanced Haemolysis Agar as isolation medium makes further testing essentially superfluous, since L. monocytogenes strains can be differentiated from L. innocua.
本研究中使用的所有确认和鉴定方法均可用于在李斯特菌属分离培养基上筛选疑似菌落。在传统的增菌程序中,微筛李斯特菌乳胶试验可快速得出结果。DNA探针(Accuprobe和Gene-Trak)在检测单核细胞增生李斯特菌方面非常特异。对于李斯特菌属的鉴定,两种试验(API和Micro-ID)表现同样出色。可能更倾向于使用API试验,因为单核细胞增生李斯特菌与无害李斯特菌的区分基于芳基酰胺酶的缺失,通过该试验可省略溶血活性和/或CAMP反应的检测。然而,使用增强溶血琼脂作为分离培养基使得进一步检测基本上是多余的,因为单核细胞增生李斯特菌菌株可与无害李斯特菌区分开来。