Hsieh C C, Chan H W, Lambe M, Ekbom A, Adami H O, Trichopoulos D
Cancer Center, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01605, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jan;32A(1):118-21. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00528-5.
We studied the relative importance of age at first and age at last full-term pregnancy (FTP) in a large data set of 3950 cases and 11,510 controls, of whom 2263 cases and 7359 controls had two or more FTPs. We found that a 5-year delay in age at first FTP is associated with an odds ratio of 1.17 (95% confidence interval of 1.05-1.29), whereas a 5-year delay in the age of last FTP is associated with an odds ratio of 1.05 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.14). Misleading results concerning the relative importance of age at first and last FTP may be obtained when parity is only adjusted in broad categories, uniparous women whose FTP is, simultaneously, both the first and the last are not excluded from the analysis, and age at any FTP between the first and last is not controlled for.
我们在一个包含3950例病例和11510例对照的大型数据集中,研究了首次足月妊娠(FTP)年龄和末次FTP年龄的相对重要性,其中2263例病例和7359例对照有两次或更多次FTP。我们发现,首次FTP年龄推迟5年,其比值比为1.17(95%置信区间为1.05 - 1.29),而末次FTP年龄推迟5年,其比值比为1.05(95%置信区间为0.96 - 1.14)。当仅对产次进行宽泛分类调整、未将FTP同时作为首次和末次的初产妇排除在分析之外,且未控制首次和末次之间任何一次FTP的年龄时,可能会得出关于首次和末次FTP年龄相对重要性的误导性结果。