Suppr超能文献

经食管多普勒超声心动图测定成人主动脉瓣狭窄患者的主动脉瓣面积

Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.

作者信息

Stoddard M F, Hammons R T, Longaker R A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1996 Aug;132(2 Pt 1):337-42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90430-5.

Abstract

Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has been shown to be an accurate method of measuring aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. The accuracy of Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for this purpose is unknown. Thus 86 consecutive adult patients (mean age 68 +/- 11 years) with calcific (n = 79) or congenital bicuspid (n = 7) AS were studied by biplane or multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. From the transgastric long-axis view, continuous wave Doppler of peak aortic valve velocity and pulsed Doppler of left ventricular outflow tract velocity were determined. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter was measured from a transesophageal echocardiography long-axis view, and cross-sectional area was calculated. Aortic valve area was calculated by the continuity equation. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was used to directly measure aortic valve area by planimetry of the minimal orifice from a short-axis view. Aortic valve area determination was less feasible by Doppler (62 of 86 patients, or 72%) versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (81 of 86 patients, or 94%; p < 0.0025) because of the inability to align the continuous wave Doppler beam with the aorta in 24 patients. The feasibility of obtaining aortic valve area by Doppler transesophageal echocardiography improved from the first 43 patients (24 of 43 patients, or 56%) to the latter 43 patients (38 of 43 patients, or 88%; p < 0.0025) and suggests a significant learning curve. In 62 patients, aortic valve area by Doppler and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography did not differ (1.30 +/- 0.54 cm2 vs 1.23 +/- 0.46 cm2, p = not significant) and correlated well (r = 0.88; standard error of the estimate = 0.26 cm2; intercept = 0.02 cm2; slope = 1.04; p = 0.0001). Absolute and percent differences between aortic valve area measured by Doppler and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography were small (0.18 +/- 0.20 cm2 and 15% +/- 15%, respectively). Mild, moderate, and severe aortic stenosis by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was correctly identified in 93% (28 of 30), 79% (15 of 19), and 77% (10 of 13) of patients by Doppler transesophageal echocardiography, respectively. Doppler transesophageal echocardiography is an accurate method to measure aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis and should complement two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. The feasibility of Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for aortic valve area determination has a significant learning curve.

摘要

二维经食管超声心动图已被证明是测量主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣面积的准确方法。为此目的,多普勒经食管超声心动图的准确性尚不清楚。因此,对86例连续的成年患者(平均年龄68±11岁)进行了研究,这些患者患有钙化性(n = 79)或先天性二叶式(n = 7)主动脉瓣狭窄,采用双平面或多平面经食管超声心动图检查。从经胃长轴视图中,测定主动脉瓣峰值流速的连续波多普勒和左心室流出道流速的脉冲多普勒。从经食管超声心动图长轴视图测量左心室流出道直径,并计算横截面积。通过连续性方程计算主动脉瓣面积。二维经食管超声心动图用于通过短轴视图对最小孔口进行平面测量来直接测量主动脉瓣面积。由于24例患者无法将连续波多普勒束与主动脉对齐,与二维经食管超声心动图(86例患者中的81例,即94%)相比,多普勒法测定主动脉瓣面积的可行性较差(86例患者中的 62例,即72%;p < 0.0025)。多普勒经食管超声心动图获得主动脉瓣面积的可行性从前43例患者(43例患者中的24例,即56%)提高到后43例患者(43例患者中的38例,即88%;p < 0.0025),这表明存在显著的学习曲线。在62例患者中,多普勒法和二维经食管超声心动图测得的主动脉瓣面积无差异(1.30±0.54 cm² 对1.23±0.46 cm²,p无统计学意义),且相关性良好(r = 0.88;估计标准误差 = 0.26 cm²;截距 = 0.02 cm²;斜率 = 1.04;p = 0.0001)。多普勒法和二维经食管超声心动图测得的主动脉瓣面积的绝对差值和百分比差值均较小(分别为0.18±0.20 cm² 和15%±15%)。二维经食管超声心动图诊断为轻度、中度和重度主动脉瓣狭窄的患者,多普勒经食管超声心动图分别正确识别出93%(30例中的28例)、79%(19例中的15例)和77%(13例中的10例)。多普勒经食管超声心动图是测量主动脉瓣狭窄患者主动脉瓣面积的准确方法,应作为二维经食管超声心动图的补充。多普勒经食管超声心动图测定主动脉瓣面积的可行性存在显著的学习曲线。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验