• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜吻合器阑尾切除术。对267例连续病例的前瞻性研究。

Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases.

作者信息

Wagner M, Aronsky D, Tschudi J, Metzger A, Klaiber C

机构信息

Surgical Department, Spital Aarberg, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1996 Sep;10(9):895-9. doi: 10.1007/s004649900192.

DOI:10.1007/s004649900192
PMID:8703146
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of laparoscopic appendectomy remains controversial. Therefore, we investigated the accuracy of diagnostic laparoscopy in detecting acute appendicitis and tested the applicability and safety of stapling appendectomy as a routine procedure.

METHODS

Data from 267 consecutive patients with suspicion of acute appendicitis were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Histopathological examination revealed nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in 63.3% and 13.1%, respectively, and no inflammation in 10.8%. Other pathological findings were observed in 12.7%. Diagnostic laparoscopy detected appendicitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.6% and 96.6%, respectively; the positive and negative predictive value were 99.5% and 74.3%, respectively. Morbidity was 10.2% in total and 40% for perforated appendicitis. Planned laparoscopic reexploration reduced morbidity by 23.4% in patients with perforated appendicitis and substantial peritonitis. Mortality was 0.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy improves diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis and laparoscopic stapling appendectomy is a safe and efficient procedure for all forms of appendicitis.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜阑尾切除术的价值仍存在争议。因此,我们研究了诊断性腹腔镜检查在检测急性阑尾炎方面的准确性,并测试了吻合器阑尾切除术作为常规手术的适用性和安全性。

方法

前瞻性记录了267例连续怀疑患有急性阑尾炎患者的数据。

结果

组织病理学检查显示,非穿孔性阑尾炎和穿孔性阑尾炎分别占63.3%和13.1%,无炎症者占10.8%。其他病理发现占12.7%。诊断性腹腔镜检查检测阑尾炎的敏感性和特异性分别为95.6%和96.6%;阳性和阴性预测值分别为99.5%和74.3%。总发病率为10.2%,穿孔性阑尾炎的发病率为40%。对于穿孔性阑尾炎和严重腹膜炎患者,计划性腹腔镜再次探查使发病率降低了23.4%。死亡率为0.4%。

结论

腹腔镜检查提高了急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性,腹腔镜吻合器阑尾切除术对于所有类型的阑尾炎都是一种安全有效的手术方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy. A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases.腹腔镜吻合器阑尾切除术。对267例连续病例的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 1996 Sep;10(9):895-9. doi: 10.1007/s004649900192.
2
Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis.计算机断层扫描和超声检查并不能改善急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗,反而可能会延误诊断和治疗。
Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):556-62. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.5.556.
3
Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的各种吻合技术:连续40例病例。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Jun;4(3):205-9.
4
Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术是治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的一种可接受的替代方法。
Surg Endosc. 1998 Jul;12(7):940-3. doi: 10.1007/s004649900752.
5
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
6
Laparoscopic versus open approach in the management of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis: a single center experience.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗单纯腹膜炎性阑尾炎的比较:单中心经验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.027. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.腹腔镜、开放及中转开腹阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jul;15(7):660-2. doi: 10.1007/s004640020072. Epub 2001 May 14.
8
Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术对于复杂性阑尾炎是可行的。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Dec;10(6):364-7.
9
Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate?穿孔性阑尾炎:早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?
Surgery. 2009 Oct;146(4):731-7; discussion 737-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.053.
10
Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment.穿孔性阑尾炎所致腹膜炎:腹腔镜或开放手术后的应激反应
Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):582-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of LigaSure in Laparoscopic Sutureless Appendectomy.LigaSure在腹腔镜无缝合阑尾切除术中的疗效与安全性
Cureus. 2022 May 5;14(5):e24764. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24764. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy with extracorporeal hand-sewn stump closure in adult patients.成人经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术联合体外手工缝合残端闭合术
Fujita Med J. 2021;7(4):111-116. doi: 10.20407/fmj.2020-009. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Tissue Reaction and the Formation of Adhesion after the Use of DS Clip in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Appendicitis diagnosis today: clinical and ultrasonic deductions.
World J Surg. 1993 Mar-Apr;17(2):243-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01658936.
2
[Errors and danger in laparoscopic appendectomy].[腹腔镜阑尾切除术的错误与风险]
Chirurg. 1993 Apr;64(4):212-20.
3
Randomized study of the value of laparoscopy before appendicectomy.阑尾切除术前腹腔镜检查价值的随机研究
Br J Surg. 1993 Jul;80(7):922-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800744.
组织反应与 DS 夹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术后粘连形成的关系。
JSLS. 2021 Oct-Dec;25(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00063.
4
A comparison of non-absorbable polymeric clips and staplers for laparoscopic appendiceal stump closure: analysis of 618 adult patients.比较不可吸收聚合物夹和吻合器用于腹腔镜阑尾残端闭合:618 例成年患者分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Sep;404(6):711-716. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01814-w. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
5
Endoloop versus endostapler: what is the best option for appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis? Results of a multicentric international survey.Endoloop 与 endostapler:在儿童复杂性阑尾炎中,阑尾残端闭合的最佳选择是什么?一项多中心国际调查的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3570-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6081-8. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
The influence of the different forms of appendix base closure on patient outcome in laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized trial.不同形式的阑尾根部闭合方式对腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者结局的影响:一项随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2295-2299. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5924-z. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Incidental appendectomy during robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy-safe and worth to perform?机器人腹腔镜前列腺切除术中偶然进行阑尾切除术——安全且值得做吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):265-269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1630-5. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Polymeric Clips for Appendiceal Stump Closure.用于阑尾残端闭合的聚合物夹的安全性和有效性
JSLS. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00045.
9
The Influence of the Appendiceal Base Diameter on Appendix Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.阑尾根部直径对腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾残端闭合的影响
World J Surg. 2016 Oct;40(10):2342-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3564-4.
10
Methods for closure of appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy procedure.腹腔镜阑尾切除术过程中阑尾残端闭合的方法。
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Aug 18;31(4):229-31. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2768. eCollection 2015.
4
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open appendicectomy.比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放性阑尾切除术的随机对照试验。
Br J Surg. 1993 Dec;80(12):1599-600. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800801236.
5
Prospective nonrandomized study of conventional versus laparoscopic appendectomy.传统阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性非随机研究。
World J Surg. 1994 May-Jun;18(3):411-5; discussion 415-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00316823.
6
Various stapling techniques in laparoscopic appendectomy: 40 consecutive cases.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的各种吻合技术:连续40例病例。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Jun;4(3):205-9.
7
[Value of celioscopy in non-traumatic acute abdomen].[腹腔镜检查在非创伤性急腹症中的价值]
Ann Chir. 1994;48(7):625-31.
8
Appendectomy in a large metropolitan hospital. Retrospective analysis of 1,013 cases.
Am J Surg. 1981 Nov;142(5):615-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90437-2.
9
Appendicitis near its centenary.阑尾炎将近百年历史。
Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):567-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198411000-00002.
10
The clinical significance of routine histopathologic study of the resected appendix and safety of appendiceal inversion.切除阑尾常规组织病理学检查的临床意义及阑尾内翻术的安全性。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Mar;162(3):256-8.