Quigley M A, Armstrong Schellenberg J R, Snow R W
Tropical Health Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England.
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(2):147-54.
The verbal autopsy (VA) questionnaire is a widely used method for collecting information on cause-specific mortality where the medical certification of deaths in childhood is incomplete. This paper discusses review by physicians and expert algorithms as approaches to ascribing cause of deaths from the VA questionnaire and proposes an alternative, data-derived approach. In this validation study, the relatives of 295 children who had died in hospital were interviewed using a VA questionnaire. The children were assigned causes of death using data-derived algorithms obtained under logistic regression and using expert algorithms. For most causes of death, the data-derived algorithms and expert algorithms yielded similar levels of diagnostic accuracy. However, a data-derived algorithm for malaria gave a sensitivity of 71% (95% Cl: 58-84%), which was significantly higher than the sensitivity of 47% obtained under an expert algorithm. The need for exploring this and other ways in which the VA technique can be improved are discussed. The implications of less-than-perfect sensitivity and specificity are explored using numerical examples. Misclassification bias should be taken into consideration when planning and evaluating epidemiological studies.
口头尸检(VA)问卷是一种广泛使用的方法,用于在儿童死亡医学证明不完整的情况下收集特定病因死亡率的信息。本文讨论了医生审查和专家算法作为从VA问卷中确定死因的方法,并提出了一种替代的、基于数据的方法。在这项验证研究中,使用VA问卷对295名在医院死亡儿童的亲属进行了访谈。使用逻辑回归获得的基于数据的算法和专家算法为这些儿童确定死因。对于大多数死因,基于数据的算法和专家算法产生了相似水平的诊断准确性。然而,一种基于数据的疟疾算法的敏感性为71%(95%可信区间:58 - 84%),显著高于专家算法获得的47%的敏感性。本文讨论了探索改进VA技术的这种及其他方法的必要性。使用数值示例探讨了敏感性和特异性欠佳的影响。在规划和评估流行病学研究时应考虑错误分类偏差。