Larder B A, Kohli A, Bloor S, Kemp S D, Harrigan P R, Schooley R T, Lange J M, Pennington K N, St Clair M H
Glaxo Wellcome Research and Development, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
J Virol. 1996 Sep;70(9):5922-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.9.5922-5929.1996.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates obtained prior to and during a combination therapy trial comparing zidovudine (AZT; 3'-azidothymidine) monotherapy with AZT plus 2',3'-dideoxyinosine (ddI) or AZT plus 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC) were assessed for the development of drug resistance. Drug susceptibility was measured by using two different phenotypic assays, one that requires infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with HIV-1 isolated from cocultures and a second based on infection of HeLa CD4+ cells with recombinant virus containing the reverse transcriptase (RT) of the clinical isolate. In addition, genotypic assessment of resistance was obtained by DNA sequencing of the RT coding region. No difference in the development of AZT resistance was noted in isolates from individuals receiving AZT monotherapy or combination therapy. However, a low frequency of ddI or ddC resistance was seen in isolates from the combination arms, which may at least partially explain the enhanced efficacy observed with these drug combinations compared with monotherapy. It was noted from DNA sequencing that a relatively high frequency of the nonnucleoside RT inhibitor resistance mutation, codon 181 changed from encoding Tyr to encoding Cys, was present in some isolates both before and during nucleoside analog combination therapy. Since these patients were unlikely to have access to nonnucleoside RT inhibitors, it is probable that this mutation preexisted at a reasonable level in the wild-type virus population. Comparisons of the AZT susceptibility assays indicated a good correlation between the phenotypic and genotypic determinations. However, direct numerical comparisons between the phenotypic assays were not reliable, suggesting that valid comparisons of different resistance data sets will require the use of the same assay procedure.
在一项比较齐多夫定(AZT;3'-叠氮胸苷)单药治疗与AZT加2',3'-双脱氧肌苷(ddI)或AZT加2',3'-双脱氧胞苷(ddC)联合治疗的试验之前及试验期间获得的1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)分离株,被评估了耐药性的发展情况。通过使用两种不同的表型分析方法来测量药物敏感性,一种方法需要用从共培养物中分离出的HIV-1感染外周血单核细胞,另一种方法基于用含有临床分离株逆转录酶(RT)的重组病毒感染HeLa CD4+细胞。此外,通过对RT编码区进行DNA测序获得耐药性的基因型评估。在接受AZT单药治疗或联合治疗的个体的分离株中,未观察到AZT耐药性发展的差异。然而,在联合治疗组的分离株中发现了低频率的ddI或ddC耐药性,这可能至少部分解释了与单药治疗相比,这些药物联合治疗观察到的疗效增强。从DNA测序中注意到,在核苷类似物联合治疗之前和期间,一些分离株中存在相对较高频率的非核苷RT抑制剂耐药性突变,即密码子181从编码酪氨酸变为编码半胱氨酸。由于这些患者不太可能使用非核苷RT抑制剂,这种突变很可能在野生型病毒群体中以合理水平预先存在。AZT敏感性分析的比较表明,表型和基因型测定之间具有良好的相关性。然而,表型分析之间的直接数值比较并不可靠,这表明对不同耐药数据集进行有效比较将需要使用相同的分析程序。