• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰强制使用自行车头盔的成本效益。

The cost-effectiveness of compulsory bicycle helmets in New Zealand.

作者信息

Hansen P, Scuffham P A

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust J Public Health. 1995 Oct;19(5):450-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00409.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00409.x
PMID:8713192
Abstract

This paper examines the cost-effectiveness for primary school children (age 5-12 years), secondary school children (13-18 years) and adults (over 18 years) of the legislation enacted on 1 January 1994 requiring road-cyclists in New Zealand to wear helmets. The cost to cyclists not in possession of a helmet before they became compulsory of either obtaining one or quitting cycling was compared with the number of deaths and hospitalisations expected to be prevented over the average life of a helmet. Corresponding to Victorian and United States estimates of the efficacy of cycle helmets at preventing serious head injuries, the cost per life saved was $88 379 to $113 744 for primary school children, $694 013 to $817 874 for secondary school children, and $890 041 to $1 014 850 for adults (New Zealand dollars = approximately 0.95 Australian dollars). The cost per hospitalisation avoided was $3304 to $4252, $17 207 to $20 278, and $49 143 to $56 035 respectively. These estimates are extremely sensitive to the estimated efficacy of helmets at protecting cyclists. Mainly anecdotal evidence for New Zealand suggests that they are not to be very effective at preventing serious head injuries; future research into the change in injury patterns as a result of the helmet regulation would be valuable. Nonetheless, the ranking of the abovementioned estimates does not contradict the policy in some parts of the world requiring helmets for children and/or teenagers, but not adults.

摘要

本文研究了1994年1月1日新西兰颁布的一项立法对于小学生(5至12岁)、中学生(13至18岁)和成年人(18岁以上)的成本效益。该立法要求新西兰的自行车骑行者佩戴头盔。将在头盔成为强制要求之前未拥有头盔的骑行者获取头盔或停止骑行的成本,与在头盔的平均使用寿命内预计可预防的死亡和住院人数进行了比较。对应于维多利亚州和美国对自行车头盔预防严重头部受伤功效的估计,每挽救一条生命的成本,小学生为88379至113744新西兰元,中学生为694013至817874新西兰元,成人为890041至1014850新西兰元(1新西兰元约等于0.95澳元)。避免每次住院的成本分别为3304至4252新西兰元、17207至20278新西兰元以及49143至56035新西兰元。这些估计对头盔保护骑行者的功效估计极为敏感。新西兰的主要传闻证据表明,头盔在预防严重头部受伤方面并非非常有效;未来针对头盔规定导致的伤害模式变化进行研究将很有价值。尽管如此,上述估计的排序与世界上一些地区要求儿童和/或青少年佩戴头盔但不要求成年人佩戴头盔的政策并不矛盾。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of compulsory bicycle helmets in New Zealand.新西兰强制使用自行车头盔的成本效益。
Aust J Public Health. 1995 Oct;19(5):450-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00409.x.
2
New Zealand bicycle helmet law--do the costs outweigh the benefits?新西兰自行车头盔法——成本是否超过收益?
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):317-20. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.317.
3
The cost effectiveness of three programs to increase use of bicycle helmets among children.三个旨在提高儿童自行车头盔使用率的项目的成本效益。
Public Health Rep. 1995 May-Jun;110(3):251-9.
4
[The rationale for promotion of bicycle helmet legislation for children up to 18 years].[关于推动针对18岁以下儿童的自行车头盔立法的基本原理]
Harefuah. 2007 Sep;146(9):690-4, 733-4.
5
Head injuries and bicycle helmet laws.头部损伤与自行车头盔法规
Accid Anal Prev. 1996 Jul;28(4):463-75. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(96)00016-4.
6
Age gradient in the cost-effectiveness of bicycle helmets.自行车头盔成本效益的年龄梯度
Prev Med. 2000 May;30(5):401-6. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0645.
7
Bicycle helmets - To wear or not to wear? A meta-analyses of the effects of bicycle helmets on injuries.自行车头盔——戴还是不戴?自行车头盔对伤害影响的荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Bicycle helmets--does the dental profession have a role in promoting their use?自行车头盔——牙科行业在推广其使用方面能发挥作用吗?
Br Dent J. 2004 May 8;196(9):555-60; discussion 539. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811227.
9
Bicycle helmet legislation: can we reach a consensus?自行车头盔立法:我们能达成共识吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Jan;39(1):86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
10
Barriers to bicycle helmet use.自行车头盔使用的障碍。
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):E4. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.e4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Cost-effectiveness of mandatory bicycle helmet use to prevent traumatic brain injuries and death.强制使用自行车头盔预防创伤性脑损伤和死亡的成本效益。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08544-5.
3
Binge drinking.酗酒
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):66. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.008375.
4
New Zealand bicycle helmet law--do the costs outweigh the benefits?新西兰自行车头盔法——成本是否超过收益?
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):317-20. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.317.
5
New Zealand's Injury Prevention Research Unit: helping shape injury prevention policy and practice.新西兰伤害预防研究单位:助力塑造伤害预防政策与实践。
Inj Prev. 1999 Mar;5(1):72-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.5.1.72.