• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Provider choice: essential to autonomy or advertising gimmick?

作者信息

Olsen D P

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 1996 Jun;3(2):108-17. doi: 10.1177/096973309600300203.

DOI:10.1177/096973309600300203
PMID:8717874
Abstract

Free choice of provider is heralded as a right of autonomy, but the goals of autonomy are better served in today's health care environment when there is informed choice of the care delivery system. The principle of liberty is distinguished from respect for autonomy. Free choice of provider would be demanded only by liberty, except that allocation of health care resources does not meet criteria for the application of liberty. Patients attempting to choose the best practitioner do not have data to support the decision. If data were available, access to these superior practitioners would become an allocation problem. A mythology of the wise practitioner fosters the concept of provider choice as a personal judgement about clinical knowledge. The emerging trends of collaborative care, standardization of practice guidelines and diversity of delivery systems among reimbursers create a situation where a patient's autonomy to choose goals for treatment is respected through the choice of delivery system.

摘要

相似文献

1
Provider choice: essential to autonomy or advertising gimmick?
Nurs Ethics. 1996 Jun;3(2):108-17. doi: 10.1177/096973309600300203.
2
Enhancing autonomy and choice in selecting and directing long term care services.在选择和指导长期护理服务方面增强自主性和选择权。
Elder Law J. 1996 Spring;4(1):55-97.
3
Reflective choice in health care: using information technology to present allocation options.医疗保健中的反思性选择:利用信息技术提供分配选项。
Am J Law Med. 1999;25(2-3):387-402.
4
[Patient autonomy and informed consent in clinical practice].[临床实践中的患者自主权与知情同意]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Jun 14;127(12):1644-7.
5
The untold story: how the health care systems in developing countries contribute to maternal mortality.不为人知的故事:发展中国家的医疗保健系统如何导致孕产妇死亡。
Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):513-28. doi: 10.2190/91YH-A52T-AFBB-1LEA.
6
Resource allocation in health care and the role of personal autonomy.医疗保健中的资源分配与个人自主权的作用。
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Mar;77(3):e44-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384542. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
7
The silent health care crisis: ethical reflections of health care for deaf and hard-of-hearing persons.无声的医疗保健危机:关于聋人和听力障碍者医疗保健的伦理思考
Fam Med. 1994 Jun;26(6):387-90.
8
Informed consent and the elderly patient.知情同意与老年患者
Clin Geriatr Med. 1986 Aug;2(3):501-10.
9
Musculoskeletal health disparities: health literacy, cultural competency, informed consent, and shared decision making.肌肉骨骼健康差异:健康素养、文化能力、知情同意和共同决策。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2014;24(2-3):195-204. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2014010918.
10
What does respect for the patient's autonomy require?尊重患者自主性需要什么?
Bioethics. 2013 Nov;27(9):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01973.x. Epub 2012 Apr 10.