Plouffe J F, Herbert M T, File T M, Baird I, Parsons J N, Kahn J B, Rielly-Gauvin K T
Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 May;40(5):1175-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1175.
Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers (+/- the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 +/- 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 +/- 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 +/- 11.2, compared with 30.2 +/- 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.
在美国,社区获得性肺炎每年发生300万至400万次,每年约有50万人住院治疗。由于缺乏早期针对病原体的诊断检测方法,通常会采用经验性治疗。本研究比较了氧氟沙星经验性治疗与标准抗生素方案(通常是一种β-内酰胺类药物,加或不加大环内酯类药物)对因社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效。对298例患者进行了治疗(146例接受氧氟沙星治疗,152例接受标准治疗);227例患者(氧氟沙星组109例,标准治疗组118例)可评估治疗效果。最常见的化脓性呼吸道病原体是流感嗜血杆菌(30株)和肺炎链球菌(24株)。共有79例患者(35%)有肺炎支原体(38例)、肺炎衣原体(40例)或军团菌属(8例)感染的证据。在可评估患者中,两组的临床成功率相似(氧氟沙星组为92%,标准治疗组为87%),在患有非典型呼吸道病原体的患者中也相似(氧氟沙星组为88%,标准治疗组为81%)。氧氟沙星组静脉使用抗生素的平均剂量(±标准差)为7.5±8.0,标准治疗组为18.4±18.5(P<0.001);氧氟沙星组患者口服剂量平均为19.7±11.2,而标准治疗组口服抗生素剂量为30.2±16.0(P<0.001)。所有治疗耐受性良好,未出现明显的临床或实验室异常。本研究结果表明,氧氟沙星对传统细菌病原体以及主要的非典型呼吸道病原体均有活性。当作为社区获得性肺炎经验性治疗的单一疗法使用时,氧氟沙星与标准抗菌治疗同样有效。