Hickey M L, Kleefield S F, Pearson S D, Hassan S M, Harding M, Haughie P, Lee T H, Brennan T A
Department of Quality Measurement and Improvement, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 May;22(5):336-44. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30237-1.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston, and its major health maintenance organization (HMO), Harvard Community Health Plan, collected data in spring 1994 which revealed that patients were less satisfied with hospital discharge planning than with other elements of care.
An interdisciplinary team, formed in November 1994 and composed of eight members from the hospital and HMO, used data from the hospital's Patient Satisfaction Survey, flowcharting, and phone interviews with patients to identify discharge planning-related problems. For example, follow-up contact with patients after discharge was erratic and no clear signal of the successful "hand off" of care from the hospital team to the community team existed.
IMPROVEMENT CYCLE 1: Eighty-three percent of the payer's patients that received the improvement strategy developed by the interdisciplinary team-a concierge service-rated discharge planning as excellent or very good, compared to 63% of control patients. IMPROVEMENT CYCLE 2: PLAN SOLUTIONS/STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING HOSPITAL DISCHARGE PLANNING: The results of the team's Cycle 1 improvement provided information for the team to use in designing a second cycle of incremental improvement activity. For example, to address the lack of clarity about who was responsible for making decisions about discharge and follow-up care, the attending physician was designated the transition-of-care coordinator. Once all the improvements were implemented, Cycle 2 patients who received the intervention rated satisfaction with discharge higher (83% versus 73%) than the control group.
Implications of hospitalwide implementation of discharge planning-related services attempted on one unit are being considered.
位于波士顿的布莱根妇女医院及其主要的健康维护组织(HMO),即哈佛社区健康计划,在1994年春季收集的数据显示,患者对医院出院计划的满意度低于对其他护理环节的满意度。
1994年11月成立了一个跨学科团队,由医院和HMO的八名成员组成,该团队利用医院患者满意度调查的数据、流程图以及对患者的电话访谈来识别与出院计划相关的问题。例如,出院后与患者的随访联系不稳定,且不存在医院团队向社区团队成功“交接”护理的明确信号。
改进周期1:接受跨学科团队制定的改进策略(礼宾服务)的付费方患者中,83%将出院计划评为优秀或非常好,而对照组患者的这一比例为63%。改进周期2:改进医院出院计划的方案/策略:团队在改进周期1的结果为其设计第二轮渐进式改进活动提供了信息。例如,为了解决在出院和后续护理决策方面责任不明确的问题,指定主治医生为护理过渡协调员。所有改进措施实施后,接受干预的改进周期2患者对出院的满意度评分(83%对73%)高于对照组。
正在考虑在全院范围内实施在一个科室尝试过的与出院计划相关服务的影响。