Suppr超能文献

忽略音调刺激时的听觉事件相关电位:低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性个体在刺激强度和潜伏期反应中所反映出的注意力差异

Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons.

作者信息

Crawford H J, Corby J C, Kopell B S

机构信息

Department of Psychology Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg 24061, USA.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 1996 Mar;85(1-2):57-69. doi: 10.3109/00207459608986351.

Abstract

Effect of hypnotic susceptibility level on auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) was studied as subjects were instructed to ignore tones while reading a novel or counting one's pulse. Assessed previously on two hypnotic susceptibility scales [Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility; Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSSC)], subjects were 12 low (lows; SHSSC 0-2) and 12 highly (highs; SHSSC 9-12) hypnotizable, right-handed college students. AERPs were recorded at C3, C4, and Cz to 50 ms 1.961 tone pips 50, 60, 70 and 80 dB intensities, pseudorandomly presented at 1.5 intervals. As predicted, highs had significantly smaller N1 and P2 amplitudes than did lows when ignoring tones. As stimuli intensities increased, N1 latencies decreased for lows while N1 latencies increased for highs. N1 latency slopes across the 50 to 80 dB intensities were significantly more negative for lows than highs; slopes correlated significantly with both hypnotizability and absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale). Thus, the highs appeared to divert greater attentional processing to the tasks at hand, particularly as the tones increased in intensity, and were slower to respond to not-to-be-attended stimuli. These results are interpreted as further evidence for hypnotic susceptibility being associated with efficient attentional processing such that highs can more effectively partition attention towards relevant stimuli and away from irrelevant stimuli than can low hypnotizables.

摘要

研究了催眠易感性水平对听觉事件相关电位(AERP)的影响,研究中让受试者在阅读小说或数脉搏时忽略音调。受试者此前在两种催眠易感性量表上进行了评估[哈佛催眠易感性群体量表;斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型(SHSSC)],为12名低催眠易感性(低分组;SHSSC 0 - 2)和12名高催眠易感性(高分组;SHSSC 9 - 12)的右利手大学生。在C3、C4和Cz记录AERP,针对强度为50、60、70和80分贝的50毫秒1.961音调短声,以1.5秒的间隔伪随机呈现。正如预期的那样,在忽略音调时,高分组的N1和P2波幅明显小于低分组。随着刺激强度增加,低分组的N1潜伏期缩短,而高分组的N1潜伏期延长。在50至80分贝强度范围内,低分组的N1潜伏期斜率比高分组明显更负;斜率与催眠易感性和专注度(特莱根专注度量表)均显著相关。因此,高分组似乎将更多的注意力加工转移到手头任务上,尤其是随着音调强度增加时,并且对未被关注的刺激反应更慢。这些结果被解释为进一步证明催眠易感性与高效的注意力加工相关,即高催眠易感性者比低催眠易感性者能更有效地将注意力分配到相关刺激上,而远离无关刺激。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验