• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忽略音调刺激时的听觉事件相关电位:低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性个体在刺激强度和潜伏期反应中所反映出的注意力差异

Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons.

作者信息

Crawford H J, Corby J C, Kopell B S

机构信息

Department of Psychology Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg 24061, USA.

出版信息

Int J Neurosci. 1996 Mar;85(1-2):57-69. doi: 10.3109/00207459608986351.

DOI:10.3109/00207459608986351
PMID:8727682
Abstract

Effect of hypnotic susceptibility level on auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) was studied as subjects were instructed to ignore tones while reading a novel or counting one's pulse. Assessed previously on two hypnotic susceptibility scales [Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility; Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSSC)], subjects were 12 low (lows; SHSSC 0-2) and 12 highly (highs; SHSSC 9-12) hypnotizable, right-handed college students. AERPs were recorded at C3, C4, and Cz to 50 ms 1.961 tone pips 50, 60, 70 and 80 dB intensities, pseudorandomly presented at 1.5 intervals. As predicted, highs had significantly smaller N1 and P2 amplitudes than did lows when ignoring tones. As stimuli intensities increased, N1 latencies decreased for lows while N1 latencies increased for highs. N1 latency slopes across the 50 to 80 dB intensities were significantly more negative for lows than highs; slopes correlated significantly with both hypnotizability and absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale). Thus, the highs appeared to divert greater attentional processing to the tasks at hand, particularly as the tones increased in intensity, and were slower to respond to not-to-be-attended stimuli. These results are interpreted as further evidence for hypnotic susceptibility being associated with efficient attentional processing such that highs can more effectively partition attention towards relevant stimuli and away from irrelevant stimuli than can low hypnotizables.

摘要

研究了催眠易感性水平对听觉事件相关电位(AERP)的影响,研究中让受试者在阅读小说或数脉搏时忽略音调。受试者此前在两种催眠易感性量表上进行了评估[哈佛催眠易感性群体量表;斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型(SHSSC)],为12名低催眠易感性(低分组;SHSSC 0 - 2)和12名高催眠易感性(高分组;SHSSC 9 - 12)的右利手大学生。在C3、C4和Cz记录AERP,针对强度为50、60、70和80分贝的50毫秒1.961音调短声,以1.5秒的间隔伪随机呈现。正如预期的那样,在忽略音调时,高分组的N1和P2波幅明显小于低分组。随着刺激强度增加,低分组的N1潜伏期缩短,而高分组的N1潜伏期延长。在50至80分贝强度范围内,低分组的N1潜伏期斜率比高分组明显更负;斜率与催眠易感性和专注度(特莱根专注度量表)均显著相关。因此,高分组似乎将更多的注意力加工转移到手头任务上,尤其是随着音调强度增加时,并且对未被关注的刺激反应更慢。这些结果被解释为进一步证明催眠易感性与高效的注意力加工相关,即高催眠易感性者比低催眠易感性者能更有效地将注意力分配到相关刺激上,而远离无关刺激。

相似文献

1
Auditory event-related potentials while ignoring tone stimuli: attentional differences reflected in stimulus intensity and latency responses in low and highly hypnotizable persons.忽略音调刺激时的听觉事件相关电位:低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性个体在刺激强度和潜伏期反应中所反映出的注意力差异
Int J Neurosci. 1996 Mar;85(1-2):57-69. doi: 10.3109/00207459608986351.
2
Visual field asymmetry in facial affect perception: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, absorption, and sustained attentional abilities.面部表情感知中的视野不对称:催眠、催眠易感性水平、专注度和持续注意力能力的调节作用。
Int J Neurosci. 1995 May;82(1-2):11-23. doi: 10.3109/00207459508994286.
3
40-Hz EEG asymmetry during recall of emotional events in waking and hypnosis: differences between low and high hypnotizables.清醒和催眠状态下回忆情绪事件时的40赫兹脑电图不对称性:低催眠易感性者与高催眠易感性者之间的差异
Int J Psychophysiol. 1989 Mar;7(1):85-96. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(89)90034-2.
4
Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1993 Nov;102(4):534-43. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.102.4.534.
5
Event-related potentials during hypnotic hallucination.催眠幻觉期间的事件相关电位。
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1994 Jan;42(1):39-55. doi: 10.1080/00207149408409340.
6
Does hypnotizability affect neurovascular coupling during cognitive tasks?催眠易感性是否会影响认知任务期间的神经血管耦合?
Physiol Behav. 2022 Dec 1;257:113915. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113915. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
EEG spectral analysis during hypnotic induction, hypnotic dream and age regression.催眠诱导、催眠梦境和年龄回溯期间的脑电图频谱分析。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1993 Sep;15(2):153-66. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90073-x.
8
Self-generated happy and sad emotions in low and highly hypnotizable persons during waking and hypnosis: laterality and regional EEG activity differences.清醒和催眠状态下低催眠易感性和高催眠易感性个体自我产生的快乐和悲伤情绪:脑电活动的偏侧性和区域差异
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Dec;24(3):239-66. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00067-0.
9
Interoception as a function of hypnotizability during rest and a heartbeat counting task.内感受功能在静息和心跳计数任务中的催眠易感性。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Jun;61(6):e14535. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14535. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
10
Modulation of the heartbeat evoked cortical potential by hypnotizability and hypnosis.催眠术和催眠状态对心跳诱发皮质电位的调制。
Psychophysiology. 2023 Sep;60(9):e14309. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14309. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
High Hypnotizability Impairs the Cerebellar Control of Pain.高催眠易感性会损害小脑对疼痛的控制。
Cerebellum. 2017 Feb;16(1):55-61. doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0764-2.