Assmann S F, Hosmer D W, Lemeshow S, Mundt K A
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amberse, USA.
Epidemiology. 1996 May;7(3):286-90. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199605000-00012.
Interaction, defined as departure of disease rates from an additive model, can be measured by the relative excess risk due to interaction, or the attributable proportion due to interaction. Point estimates can be obtained using multiple logistic regression. Using simulated case-control data, we compare several confidence interval estimation techniques for these measures. These include a symmetrical interval based on the delta method estimate of the variance, and three types of bootstrap confidence intervals. One such bootstrap method has coverage closest to the nominal level and is the most evenly balanced with respect to the direction in which intervals miss the true value. The estimation methods are applied to data from an actual case-control study, and the results are interpreted in light of the simulation study.
交互作用被定义为疾病发生率偏离相加模型的情况,可以通过交互作用导致的相对超额风险或交互作用导致的归因比例来衡量。点估计可以使用多重逻辑回归获得。我们使用模拟的病例对照数据,比较了这些指标的几种置信区间估计技术。这些技术包括基于方差的德尔塔法估计的对称区间,以及三种类型的自助置信区间。其中一种自助法的覆盖率最接近名义水平,并且在区间错过真实值的方向上最为平衡。我们将这些估计方法应用于一项实际病例对照研究的数据,并根据模拟研究对结果进行解释。