Sluyter F, Korte S M, Bohus B, Van Oortmerssen G A
URA 1294 CNRS, Université Paris V René Descartes, France.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 May;54(1):113-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02164-7.
Genetically selected aggressive and nonaggressive male wild house mice were tested in the shock-probe/defensive burying test: Five distinct behaviors (burying, immobility, rearing, grooming, and exploration) were recorded in two environmental situations: fresh and home cage sawdust. Nonaggressive animals, characterized by a Long Attack Latency (LAL), showed more immobility in both test situations than animals having Short Attack Latencies (SAL), whereas SAL males displayed more defensive burying than LAL ones when tested with fresh sawdust. Testing with home cage sawdust, however, resulted in the same duration of defensive burying in SAL and LAL. These results support earlier findings about the existence of two heritable, fundamentally different strategies to cope with aversive situations. Aggressive (SAL) animal react actively to environmental challenges, whereas nonaggressive animals react actively or passively, depending on the characteristics of the stressful environment. These mouse lines, selected for attack latency, i.e., aggression, may, therefore, be important tools to unravel the genetic architecture underlying the physiological and neuronal mechanisms of behavioral strategies towards stressful events.
对经过基因筛选的具有攻击性和非攻击性的雄性野生家鼠进行了电击探针/防御性掩埋测试:在两种环境条件下记录了五种不同的行为(掩埋、静止不动、直立、梳理毛发和探索):新鲜木屑和笼内原有木屑环境。以长攻击潜伏期(LAL)为特征的非攻击性动物在两种测试环境中都比具有短攻击潜伏期(SAL)的动物表现出更多的静止不动行为,而在用新鲜木屑测试时,SAL雄性比LAL雄性表现出更多的防御性掩埋行为。然而,用笼内原有木屑进行测试时,SAL和LAL的防御性掩埋持续时间相同。这些结果支持了早期的研究发现,即存在两种遗传的、根本不同的应对厌恶情境的策略。具有攻击性的(SAL)动物对环境挑战会做出积极反应,而非攻击性动物则根据应激环境的特点做出积极或消极反应。因此,这些因攻击潜伏期(即攻击性)而被选择的小鼠品系可能是揭示应对应激事件的行为策略的生理和神经机制背后的遗传结构的重要工具。