Arambasic L
Department of Psychology, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
J Trauma Stress. 1996 Apr;9(2):325-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02110664.
This study investigated the appraisal of control (secondary appraisal) and coping as reactions to the air-raids in the city of Zagreb. Coping was assessed with the Croatian version of Ways of Coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) and secondary appraisal was operationalized as control over the occurrence and over the outcome/consequences of the air-raid. The hypotheses that appraisal of low control would yield more emotion-focused and passive coping, and that appraisal of high control would be linked with problem-focused and active coping, were not confirmed. The results were interpreted in terms of so-called emotional habituation. Additionally, some unique characteristics of the air-raid were identified and explained as the key variables in the interpretation of the obtained results: an air-raid is a very specific stressful situation, it is homogeneous in content, and it is a chronic and repeated stressor. The problems with generalization of these data to all stressful events were pointed out.
本研究调查了作为对萨格勒布市空袭反应的控制评估（二级评估）和应对方式。应对方式通过克罗地亚语版的《应对方式问卷》（拉扎勒斯和福克曼，1984年）进行评估，二级评估被定义为对空袭发生及其结果/后果的控制。低控制评估会导致更多以情绪为中心的被动应对方式，而高控制评估会与以问题为中心的主动应对方式相关联，这两个假设未得到证实。研究结果根据所谓的情绪习惯化进行了解释。此外，还确定了空袭的一些独特特征，并将其解释为解释所得结果的关键变量：空袭是一种非常特殊的应激情况，其内容具有同质性，并且是一种慢性反复应激源。同时指出了将这些数据推广到所有应激事件时存在的问题。
