Suppr超能文献

白内障手术中局部麻醉与球周麻醉的比较。

Topical versus peribulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery.

作者信息

Roman S, Auclin F, Ullern M

机构信息

Quinze-Vingts Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Oct;22(8):1121-4. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80129-5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the use of topical anesthesia with that of peribulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery.

SETTING

Quinze-Vingts Hospital, Paris, France.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 45 patients who had phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in both eyes with 1 to 9 months between surgeries. Each patient had peribulbar anesthesia for one surgery and topical anesthesia for the other. The anesthesia method for the first eye was randomly selected. After surgery, patients were asked to rate their pain and whether they preferred one anesthesia technique over the other.

RESULTS

When topical anesthesia was given, 82.2% of patients required no intravenous medications. Overall, 62.2% preferred topical over peribulbar anesthesia, with most patients citing the lack of periocular injection as the reason.

CONCLUSION

Despite the increased technical difficulty, topical anesthesia proved an effective alternative to peribulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery that avoids the risks of periocular injection and reduces the need for intravenous medications.

摘要

目的

比较白内障手术中表面麻醉与球周麻醉的应用情况。

地点

法国巴黎万森纳医院。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了45例患者,他们双眼均接受了超声乳化白内障吸除术和人工晶状体植入术,两次手术间隔1至9个月。每位患者一只眼采用球周麻醉,另一只眼采用表面麻醉。第一眼的麻醉方法随机选择。术后,要求患者对疼痛程度进行评分,并询问他们是否更喜欢其中一种麻醉技术。

结果

给予表面麻醉时,82.2%的患者不需要静脉用药。总体而言,62.2%的患者更喜欢表面麻醉而非球周麻醉,大多数患者表示原因是避免了眼周注射。

结论

尽管技术难度增加,但表面麻醉被证明是白内障手术中球周麻醉的有效替代方法,可避免眼周注射的风险并减少静脉用药的需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验