Callahan C M, Dittus R S, Tierney W M
Division of General Internal Medicine, Regenstrief Institute for Health Care, Indianapolis, IN 46202-2859, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Apr;11(4):218-25. doi: 10.1007/BF02642478.
To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision making regarding late-life depression.
Longitudinal collection of data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and content of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical trial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of late-life depression.
Academic primary care group practice.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians who completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical assessments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patients who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires.
Intervention physicians were provided with their patient's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patient-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionnaire regarding their clinical assessment.
Those physicians not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patients as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians regarding their clinical assessments. A physician's clinical rating of likely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of treatment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were facilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was received by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to treat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patient doubts about treatment benefits.
Lack of recognition of depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treatment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did not consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatment decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients and physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and how accurately they make these judgments.
描述初级保健医生针对老年抑郁症的临床决策过程。
作为一项针对医生的干预措施以改善老年抑郁症治疗的随机临床试验的一部分,纵向收集有关医生临床评估以及患者门诊就诊量和内容的数据。
学术性初级保健团体诊所。
患者/参与者:111名初级保健医生,他们在对222名在筛查问卷中报告有抑郁症状的老年患者进行评估后,立即填写了一份结构化问卷以描述其临床评估情况。
在完成关于其临床评估的问卷之前,为干预组医生提供其患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评分以及针对患者的具体治疗建议。
通过对这些医生关于其临床评估的具体询问确定,那些未获得HAM-D评分的医生将其患者评定为抑郁的可能性相同。医生对可能患有抑郁症的临床评定并不一定会导致制定治疗意图或采取治疗行动。提供治疗算法有助于促进治疗意图和行动,但在医生打算治疗的患者中,接受治疗的患者不到一半。治疗障碍似乎包括医生和患者对治疗益处的怀疑。
对抑郁症状缺乏识别似乎不是治疗的主要障碍。对症状的识别和获得治疗算法并不一定会导致在治疗决策过程进入后续阶段。需要更多研究来确定患者和医生如何权衡治疗的潜在风险和益处,以及他们做出这些判断的准确性如何。