• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic.

作者信息

Binder K S, Morris R K

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Sep;21(5):1186-96. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1186.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1186
PMID:8744960
Abstract

Eye movements were monitored as participants read passages that contained 2 occurrences of a balanced ambiguous word. In Experiment 1, local context was manipulated so that the meaning of the ambiguous word either remained the same or changed from the 1st to 2nd encounter. In Experiments 2 and 3. global context was manipulated by shifting the discourse topic between the 2 instances of the ambiguous word. Gaze durations on the 2nd instance of the ambiguous word were shorter when the meaning remained consistent than when the meaning changed, and this facilitation was impervious to changes in the discourse structure. In contrast, processing time in the region immediately following the target was longer when the word meaning changed, but only when the topic of the discourse remained the same throughout the passage. When the topic was shifted, this effect disappeared.

摘要

相似文献

1
Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Sep;21(5):1186-96. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1186.
2
Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: an eye movement examination.句子和语篇主题对词汇歧义加工的影响:一项眼动研究
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jul;31(5):690-702. doi: 10.3758/bf03196108.
3
Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.眼动与词汇歧义消解:探究从属偏向效应
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):335-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.335.
4
Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.全局语境对词汇歧义加工的影响:来自眼动注视的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2001 Mar;29(2):363-72. doi: 10.3758/bf03194931.
5
Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 May;21(3):582-95. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.3.582.
6
Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.标题对文本和词汇歧义单词加工的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1011-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03209349.
7
Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.句法类别分配对阅读中词汇歧义消解的影响:一项眼动分析
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):87-99. doi: 10.3758/bf03196085.
8
Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.阅读词汇歧义单词时的选择机制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Sep;15(5):779-90. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.779.
9
Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements.阅读过程中词汇歧义的即时消解:来自眼动的证据。
Br J Psychol. 2006 Nov;97(Pt 4):467-82. doi: 10.1348/000712605X89363.
10
Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.功能词和实词的词汇加工与文本整合:来自启动效应和眼动注视的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1098-108. doi: 10.3758/bf03211811.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamics of learning new words from context.从语境中学习新单词的动态过程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jul;154(7):1784-1799. doi: 10.1037/xge0001768. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Context Facilitates the Decoding of Lexically Ambiguous Words for Adult Literacy Learners.语境有助于成年识字学习者对词汇歧义的解码。
Read Writ. 2023 Mar;36(3):699-722. doi: 10.1007/s11145-022-10315-0. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
3
Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.从带有简短叙述的词义启动范式看歧义词的词义学习
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e14070. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14070. eCollection 2022.
4
Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation.说话人特定线索影响语义消歧。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Oct;51(5):933-955. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09852-0. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Vocabulary accessibility and acquisition: do you get more from a financestor or a sociophite?词汇的可及性与习得:你从金融怪才还是社交怪胎那里能收获更多? (注:这里“financestor”和“sociophite”可能并非标准词汇,属于生造词,翻译是基于字面意思尽量贴近的表达 )
J Res Read. 2020 Nov;43(4):395-416. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12314. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
The Effects of Meaning Dominance in the Time-Course of Activation of L2 Lexical Ambiguity Processing.意义优势在二语词汇歧义加工激活时间进程中的作用
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Dec;48(6):1269-1284. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09657-8.
7
Phonological Ambiguity Detection Outside of Consciousness and Its Defensive Avoidance.意识之外的语音歧义检测及其防御性回避
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 5;13:77. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00077. eCollection 2019.
8
Linguistic Focus Promotes the Ease of Discourse Integration Processes in Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.语言焦点促进阅读理解中语篇整合过程的流畅性:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;9:2718. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02718. eCollection 2018.
9
Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming.词汇语义表征的重新调整:词义启动中的重复与间隔效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000507. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
10
The Interplay between Topic Shift and Focus in the Dynamic Construction of Discourse Representations.话语表征动态构建中话题转换与焦点的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 8;8:2184. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02184. eCollection 2017.