Moser E I
Centre for Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Behav Brain Res. 1995 Nov;71(1-2):11-8. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00051-8.
It is commonly believed that learning is based on modifications of synaptic strength. Much of the evidence for this comes from the observation that blockade of processes necessary for induction of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus also blocks certain forms of learning. As such correlations may have many causes, an understanding of the mechanisms for memory formation might also profit from direct recording of cellular activity in learning tasks. Field potential recording represents one such approach. Although changes in field potentials are unlikely to uncover modifications in synaptic strength related to the storage of memory, any general facilitation (or reduction) of synaptic transmission taking place in populations of neurons during the acquisition stage might be picked up by a field measure. One problem related to the approach is that field potentials are heavily affected by non-learning factors. It is shown that field potentials in the hippocampus are highly sensitive to changes in brain temperature and that a significant part of the increase in field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (f-EPSPs) during learning reflects warming of the brain. Temperature-related changes in synaptic transmission do not affect the efficiency of spatial learning, as the acquisition of a water-maze task is equally efficient at low (30-32 degrees C) and high (37-39 degrees C) brain temperatures. Subtraction of the temperature component of the field potential alterations during learning in an exploration task shows that exploration is accompanied by a temperature-independent synaptic potentiation as well. Both the f-EPSP and the population spike are increased, and both decay gradually within 15-20 min. It is important to find out whether this potentiation reflects learning-related processes and whether such a potentiation is useful to the brain given the apparent 'noise' caused by temperature-related physiological changes.
人们普遍认为学习是基于突触强度的改变。这一观点的许多证据来自于这样的观察:阻断海马体中诱导长时程增强所必需的过程也会阻断某些形式的学习。由于这种相关性可能有多种原因,对记忆形成机制的理解也可能受益于在学习任务中直接记录细胞活动。场电位记录就是这样一种方法。虽然场电位的变化不太可能揭示与记忆存储相关的突触强度的改变,但在获取阶段神经元群体中发生的任何突触传递的普遍促进(或减少)都可能通过场测量检测到。与这种方法相关的一个问题是场电位受到非学习因素的严重影响。研究表明,海马体中的场电位对脑温变化高度敏感,并且学习过程中场兴奋性突触后电位(f-EPSP)的显著增加部分反映了大脑的升温。突触传递中与温度相关的变化不会影响空间学习的效率,因为在低(30-32摄氏度)和高(37-39摄氏度)脑温下,水迷宫任务的获取效率是相同的。在探索任务中学习期间,减去场电位变化的温度成分表明,探索也伴随着与温度无关的突触增强。f-EPSP和群体峰电位都增加,并且两者在15-20分钟内逐渐衰减。重要的是要弄清楚这种增强是否反映了与学习相关的过程,以及考虑到与温度相关的生理变化所产生的明显“噪声”,这种增强对大脑是否有用。