• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AMPA和/或NMDA受体介导的长时程增强(LTP)的表达取决于强直刺激期间NMDA受体的激活程度。

Expression of LTP by AMPA and/or NMDA receptors is determined by the extent of NMDA receptors activation during the tetanus.

作者信息

Aniksztejn L, Ben-Ari Y

机构信息

Institute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U29, Hôpital de Port-Royal, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2349-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2349.

DOI:10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2349
PMID:8747197
Abstract
  1. We have tested, in CA1 hippocampal slices, the hypothesis that the expression of long-term potentiation (LTP) by alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and/or N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors depends on the degree of NMDA receptors activation during the tetanus. 2. Slices were perfused in an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing glycine (1 microM), bicuculline (5 microM) and a low Mg2+ concentration (0.3 mM). To measure the AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSPA and fEPSPN, respectively), we have used the following procedure: control fEPSPA was first measured, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX, 10 microM) was then added, and fEPSPN was evoked. CNQX was washed, and once control fEPSPA was recorded, the Schaffer collaterals were tetanized at a weak or a strong intensity. The slope of fEPSPA was measured for 30-45 min followed by that of fEPSPN after the application of CNQX. 3. At a weak intensity (TW, which corresponds to a fEPSPA of approximately 0.3 mV of amplitude and no fEPSPN), the tetanic stimulation generated LTP of fEPSPA (58.7 +/- 8.1% mean +/- SE, n = 9) but no significant potentiation of the fEPSPN (11.2 +/- 2.2%, n = 9). These values were significantly different (P < 0.05, analysis of variance, Fisher test). 4. In 9 of 13 slices, tetanic stimulation of strong intensity (Ts, intensity corresponding to a fEPSPN of approximately 0.3 mV of amplitude) generated LTP of fEPSPN (89.1 +/- 17.2%) but not of fEPSPA (9.44 +/- 2.8%). In the four remaining slices the tetani induce LTP of both fEPSPA and fEPSPN (81.7 +/- 14.7% and 101 +/- 35.6%, respectively, both values were not significantly different). 5. We then examined the effects of decreasing fEPSPN by 50% in LTP generated by Ts and Tw. In the presence of 7-Chlorokynurenate (7Cl(-)-Kyn; 6 microM; n = 6), an antagonist of the allosteric glycine site of the NMDA receptors, Ts generated LTP of fEPSPA (63.2 +/- 8.2%) but not of fEPSPN (12.6 +/- 4.0%). Both values were significantly different. Tw still evoked LTP of fEPSPA but of smaller magnitude (29.8 +/- 6.3%, n = 8) than the one obtained in the absence of the antagonist (58.7 +/- 8.1%). Both values were significantly different. 6. The present observation suggests that l) LTP of fEPSPA has a lower threshold than that of fEPSPN, i.e., stronger activation of NMDA receptors during the tetani is required to induce LTP of fEPSPN than the one required for inducing LTP of fEPSPA; and 2) there is a bell-shaped relationship between the degree of activation of NMDA receptors during the tetani and the magnitude of LTP of the fEPSPA: tetani that generate LTP of fEPSPN have a low probability to induce LTP of fEPSPA. We suggest that AMPA and NMDA components are potentiated through two different presumably postsynaptic processes.
摘要
  1. 我们在海马体CA1区切片中测试了以下假说:α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸(AMPA)和/或N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体介导的长时程增强(LTP)的表达取决于强直刺激期间NMDA受体的激活程度。2. 切片在含有甘氨酸(1微摩尔)、荷包牡丹碱(5微摩尔)和低镁离子浓度(0.3毫摩尔)的人工脑脊液(ACSF)中灌注。为了测量AMPA和NMDA受体介导的场兴奋性突触后电位(分别为fEPSPA和fEPSPN),我们采用了以下步骤:首先测量对照fEPSPA,然后加入6-氰基-7-硝基喹喔啉-2,3-二酮(CNQX,10微摩尔),并诱发fEPSPN。冲洗掉CNQX,一旦记录到对照fEPSPA,就以弱强度或强强度对谢弗侧支进行强直刺激。测量fEPSPA的斜率30 - 45分钟,然后在应用CNQX后测量fEPSPN的斜率。3. 在弱强度(TW,对应于幅度约为0.3毫伏的fEPSPA且无fEPSPN)下,强直刺激产生了fEPSPA的LTP(平均增加58.7±8.1%,标准误,n = 9),但fEPSPN没有显著增强(11.2±2.2%,n = 9)。这些值有显著差异(P < 0.05,方差分析,费舍尔检验)。4. 在13个切片中的9个中,强强度的强直刺激(Ts,强度对应于幅度约为0.3毫伏的fEPSPN)产生了fEPSPN的LTP(89.1±17.2%),但没有产生fEPSPA的LTP(9.44±2.8%)。在其余4个切片中,强直刺激诱导了fEPSPA和fEPSPN的LTP(分别为81.7±14.7%和101±35.6%,两个值均无显著差异)。5. 然后我们研究了在Ts和Tw产生的LTP中使fEPSPN降低50%的影响。在存在7-氯犬尿氨酸(7Cl(-)-Kyn;6微摩尔;n = 6),一种NMDA受体变构甘氨酸位点拮抗剂的情况下,Ts产生了fEPSPA的LTP(63.2±8.2%),但没有产生fEPSPN的LTP(12.6±4.0%)。两个值有显著差异。Tw仍然诱发了fEPSPA的LTP,但幅度比在没有拮抗剂时获得的小(29.8±6.3%,n = 8)。两个值有显著差异。6. 目前的观察结果表明:1)fEPSPA的LTP阈值低于fEPSPN的阈值,即强直刺激期间诱导fEPSPN的LTP比诱导fEPSPA的LTP需要更强的NMDA受体激活;2)强直刺激期间NMDA受体的激活程度与fEPSPA的LTP幅度之间存在钟形关系:产生fEPSPN的LTP的强直刺激诱导fEPSPA的LTP的概率较低。我们认为AMPA和NMDA成分是通过两种不同的可能是突触后过程增强的。

相似文献

1
Expression of LTP by AMPA and/or NMDA receptors is determined by the extent of NMDA receptors activation during the tetanus.AMPA和/或NMDA受体介导的长时程增强(LTP)的表达取决于强直刺激期间NMDA受体的激活程度。
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2349-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2349.
2
A selective LTP of NMDA receptor-mediated currents induced by anoxia in CA1 hippocampal neurons.缺氧诱导的海马CA1区神经元NMDA受体介导电流的选择性长时程增强。
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):2045-55. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.5.2045.
3
Intracellular injection of a Ca2+ chelator prevents generation of anoxic LTP.向细胞内注射钙离子螯合剂可阻止缺氧性长时程增强的产生。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Feb;75(2):770-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.2.770.
4
On the mechanism of long-term potentiation induced by (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid (ACPD) in rat hippocampal slices.关于(1S,3R)-1-氨基环戊烷-1,3-二羧酸(ACPD)诱导大鼠海马切片长时程增强的机制
Neuropharmacology. 1995 Aug;34(8):1003-14. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00054-a.
5
Blocking GABA(A) inhibition reveals AMPA- and NMDA-receptor-mediated polysynaptic responses in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus.阻断GABA(A)抑制可揭示大鼠海马体CA1区中AMPA和NMDA受体介导的多突触反应。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):2071-82. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.2071.
6
The complementary nature of long-term depression and potentiation revealed by dual component excitatory postsynaptic potentials in hippocampal slices from young rats.幼年大鼠海马切片中双成分兴奋性突触后电位揭示的长时程抑制和增强的互补性质。
Neuroscience. 1995 Oct;68(3):625-35. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00173-g.
7
Pregnenolone sulfate enhances long-term potentiation in CA1 in rat hippocampus slices through the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors.硫酸孕烯醇酮通过调节N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体增强大鼠海马切片CA1区的长时程增强效应。
J Neurosci Res. 2004 Dec 1;78(5):691-701. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20332.
8
Synaptic potentiation of dual-component excitatory postsynaptic currents in the rat hippocampus.大鼠海马体中双组分兴奋性突触后电流的突触增强作用。
J Physiol. 1995 Jan 1;482 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):39-52. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020498.
9
Characterization of the anoxia-induced long-term synaptic potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus.大鼠海马体CA1区缺氧诱导的长期突触增强的特征
Br J Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;122(4):671-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701409.
10
Role of AMPA and NMDA receptors and back-propagating action potentials in spike timing-dependent plasticity.AMPA 和 NMDA 受体以及逆行动作电位在依赖峰时间的可塑性中的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):47-54. doi: 10.1152/jn.00416.2009. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Senescent neurophysiology: Ca signaling from the membrane to the nucleus.衰老的神经生理学:从膜到核的钙信号转导。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Oct;164:107064. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107064. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Subunit contribution to NMDA receptor hypofunction and redox sensitivity of hippocampal synaptic transmission during aging.衰老过程中,亚基对NMDA受体功能减退及海马突触传递氧化还原敏感性的作用。
Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Jul 24;11(14):5140-5157. doi: 10.18632/aging.102108.
3
Alteration in NMDA Receptor Mediated Glutamatergic Neurotransmission in the Hippocampus During Senescence.
衰老过程中海马 NMDA 受体介导的谷氨酸能神经传递的改变。
Neurochem Res. 2019 Jan;44(1):38-48. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-2634-4. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Matrix Metalloprotease 3 Activity Supports Hippocampal EPSP-to-Spike Plasticity Following Patterned Neuronal Activity via the Regulation of NMDAR Function and Calcium Flux.基质金属蛋白酶3的活性通过调节NMDAR功能和钙通量,在模式化神经元活动后支持海马体兴奋性突触后电位到动作电位的可塑性。
Mol Neurobiol. 2017 Jan;54(1):804-816. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9970-7. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
5
Identity of endogenous NMDAR glycine site agonist in amygdala is determined by synaptic activity level.内源性 NMDA 受体甘氨酸位点激动剂在杏仁核中的身份由突触活动水平决定。
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1760. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2779.
6
NMDA receptor subunits in the adult rat hippocampus undergo similar changes after 5 minutes in an open field and after LTP induction.成年大鼠海马中的 NMDA 受体亚基在开放场中 5 分钟后和 LTP 诱导后经历相似的变化。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055244. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Synaptic plasticity of NMDA receptors: mechanisms and functional implications.NMDA 受体的突触可塑性:机制与功能意义。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Jun;22(3):496-508. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
8
The muscarinic long-term enhancement of NMDA and AMPA receptor-mediated transmission at Schaffer collateral synapses develop through different intracellular mechanisms.在 Schaffer 侧支突触上,毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱受体对 NMDA 和 AMPA 受体介导的传递的长期增强作用是通过不同的细胞内机制产生的。
J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 18;30(33):11032-42. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1848-10.2010.
9
Synaptic NR2A- but not NR2B-Containing NMDA Receptors Increase with Blockade of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors.突触 NMDA 受体 NR2A 而非 NR2B 亚型含量随离子型谷氨酸受体阻断而增加。
Front Mol Neurosci. 2009 Oct 26;2:19. doi: 10.3389/neuro.02.019.2009. eCollection 2009.
10
Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity of NMDA receptors.NMDA 受体的活动依赖性突触可塑性。
J Physiol. 2010 Jan 1;588(Pt 1):93-9. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179382. Epub 2009 Oct 12.