Virgo K S, Naunheim K S, McKirgan L W, Kissling M E, Lin J C, Johnson F E
Department of Surgery, St. Louis University Health Sciences Center, MO 63110-0250, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Aug;112(2):356-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70262-3.
The two objectives of this study were to determine the range of recommended follow-up strategies for patients with lung cancer treated with curative intent and to estimate the cost of such follow-up. Ten articles delineating eight specific follow-up strategies were identified from a Medline search of the literature for 1980 through 1995. An economic analysis was done of the costs associated with the identified strategies. Charge data obtained from the Part B Medicare Annual Data file and the Hospital Outpatient Bill file were used as a proxy for cost. Follow-up intensity varied widely across strategies for 5 years of posttreatment follow-up. Medicare-allowed charges for 5-year follow-up ranged from a low of $946 to a high of $5645. When Medicare-allowed charges were converted to a proxy for actual charges by a conversion ratio of 1.62, the range was $1533 to $9145, a fivefold difference in charges. There was no indication that more intensive, higher-cost strategies increased survival or quality of life. The published literature, including textbooks, holds few answers in this area.
本研究的两个目的是确定对接受根治性治疗的肺癌患者推荐的随访策略范围,并估算此类随访的成本。通过对1980年至1995年的医学文献进行Medline检索,确定了10篇描述8种特定随访策略的文章。对与所确定策略相关的成本进行了经济分析。从医疗保险B部分年度数据文件和医院门诊账单文件中获取的收费数据被用作成本的替代指标。在治疗后5年的随访中,不同策略的随访强度差异很大。5年随访的医疗保险允许收费范围从低至946美元到高至5645美元。当医疗保险允许收费通过1.62的换算率转换为实际收费的替代指标时,范围为1533美元至9145美元,收费相差五倍。没有迹象表明更密集、成本更高的策略能提高生存率或生活质量。包括教科书在内的已发表文献在这一领域几乎没有提供答案。