Suppr超能文献

沙美特罗与沙丁胺醇治疗哮喘患者的安慰剂对照交叉比较

A placebo-controlled, crossover comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with asthma.

作者信息

Leblanc P, Knight A, Kreisman H, Borkhoff C M, Johnston P R

机构信息

Centre de Pneumologie, Hôpital Laval et Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Aug;154(2 Pt 1):324-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.2.8756801.

Abstract

We compared the effects of salmeterol (Sm) (50 micrograms twice daily) with that of salbutamol (Sb) (200 micrograms four times daily) and placebo (P) in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma with asthma symptoms and related the effectiveness of these therapies between patients who used concurrent inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and those who did not. The study was a 12-wk, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with 367 adult asthmatics randomized to each trial medication for 4 wk. Inhaled Sb was provided as rescue medication to all patients throughout the trial. Only 80% of patients, albeit the majority, were receiving maintenance treatment with ICS throughout this trial; this reflects practice current in early 1990. Each study day, patients recorded their morning and evening peak expiratory flows (PEF), assessment of asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication. Both morning and evening PEF were greater during treatment with Sm than with Sb (mean differences between the treatments of 29.8 and 14.3 L/min, respectively) or P (27.7 and 20.3 L/min, respectively) (p < 0.0001). Sm was also more effective than Sb or P in lowering diurnal variation in PEF and increasing the percentage of symptom-free days and rescue-free days and nights with no sleep disturbance (p < or = 0.0004). Sb was more effective than P in increasing evening PEF and the percentage of symptom-free days (p < 0.05) and rescue-free days (p < 0.0001). The same clinical superiority of Sm compared with Sb and P was observed in those patients using ICS (p < 0.001 for all treatment comparisons), and to a greater extent than in those patients not using ICS (i.e., Sm was more effective than Sb and P in just six of the 20 treatment comparisons; p < 0.05). In conclusion, Sm 50 micrograms twice daily is effective in the management of mild-to-moderate asthma and it further improves asthma control in patients already using ICS.

摘要

我们比较了沙美特罗(Sm)(每日两次,每次50微克)与沙丁胺醇(Sb)(每日四次,每次200微克)及安慰剂(P)对轻至中度哮喘且有哮喘症状患者的影响,并比较了这些疗法在同时使用吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)的患者与未使用ICS的患者之间的有效性。该研究是一项为期12周的多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验,367名成年哮喘患者被随机分配接受每种试验药物治疗4周。在整个试验过程中,为所有患者提供吸入用Sb作为急救药物。在整个试验中,只有80%的患者(尽管是大多数)接受ICS维持治疗;这反映了20世纪90年代初的实际情况。每个研究日,患者记录其早晚的呼气峰值流速(PEF)、哮喘症状评估以及急救药物的使用情况。治疗期间,Sm组早晚的PEF均高于Sb组(两组治疗的平均差值分别为29.8和14.3升/分钟)或P组(分别为27.7和20.3升/分钟)(p<0.0001)。在降低PEF的日间变异性、增加无症状天数以及无急救药物使用天数和无睡眠障碍的夜晚数方面,Sm也比Sb或P更有效(p≤0.0004)。在增加夜间PEF、无症状天数百分比(p<0.05)和无急救药物使用天数百分比(p<0.0001)方面,Sb比P更有效。在使用ICS的患者中也观察到Sm相对于Sb和P具有同样的临床优势(所有治疗比较p<0.001),且程度大于未使用ICS的患者(即Sm在20项治疗比较中仅在6项中比Sb和P更有效;p<0.05)。总之,每日两次,每次50微克的Sm对轻至中度哮喘的治疗有效,并且能进一步改善已使用ICS患者的哮喘控制情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验