• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[新生儿科鼻腔持续正压通气新技术]

[New technique of nasal continuous positive pressure in neonatology].

作者信息

Claris O, Salle B L, Lapillonne A, Ronin E, Picaud J C, Besnier S

机构信息

Service de néonatologie, hôpital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr. 1996 May;3(5):452-6. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)86403-7.

DOI:10.1016/0929-693x(96)86403-7
PMID:8763715
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early treatment with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome is useful, by recruiting alveoli and restoring the functional residual capacity.

POPULATION AND METHODS

Nasal CPAP was supplied by the Infant Flow Driver (Electro Medical Equipment). From 15 June 1994 to 15 December 1994, 42 neonates received nasal CPAP. Their mean birthweight and gestational age were 1511 +/- 411 g and 30.9 +/- 2.5 weeks, respectively. Fifteen infants had been ventilated for hyaline membrane disease and nasal CPAP was applied immediately after extubation. In the other 27 infants, nasal CPAP was given soon after birth (respiratory distress syndrome: 20 neonates; apneic spells: seven neonates).

RESULTS

Three infants needed subsequent mechanical ventilation because of the severity of the disease (one had spontaneous pneumothorax); four infants received exogenous surfactant (Curosurf, one single dose) within a brief period of mechanical ventilation (30-45 min). There were no failure of extubation, and no intracranial lesions. Excess of pharyngeal secretion and abdominal distension were common.

CONCLUSION

Early treatment with nasal CPAP reduces the need for mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, surfactant therapy required by a moderate to severe disease is possible with a rather short period of artificial ventilation.

摘要

背景

对患有呼吸窘迫综合征的新生儿早期使用经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)是有效的,它可以使肺泡复张并恢复功能残气量。

研究对象与方法

经鼻CPAP由婴儿气流驱动仪(电子医疗设备)提供。1994年6月15日至1994年12月15日期间,42例新生儿接受了经鼻CPAP治疗。他们的平均出生体重和胎龄分别为1511±411克和30.9±2.5周。15例婴儿因透明膜病接受过机械通气,拔管后立即应用经鼻CPAP。另外27例婴儿在出生后不久接受了经鼻CPAP治疗(呼吸窘迫综合征:20例新生儿;呼吸暂停发作:7例新生儿)。

结果

3例婴儿因病情严重需要后续机械通气(1例发生自发性气胸);4例婴儿在短暂机械通气(30 - 45分钟)期间接受了外源性表面活性物质(珂立苏,单剂量)治疗。没有拔管失败的情况,也没有颅内病变。咽部分泌物过多和腹胀很常见。

结论

早期经鼻CPAP治疗可减少机械通气的需求。此外,对于中重度疾病所需的表面活性物质治疗,在较短时间的人工通气后是可行的。

相似文献

1
[New technique of nasal continuous positive pressure in neonatology].[新生儿科鼻腔持续正压通气新技术]
Arch Pediatr. 1996 May;3(5):452-6. doi: 10.1016/0929-693x(96)86403-7.
2
Response of Preterm Infants to 2 Noninvasive Ventilatory Support Systems: Nasal CPAP and Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation.早产儿对两种无创通气支持系统的反应:鼻持续气道正压通气和鼻间歇正压通气。
Respir Care. 2015 Dec;60(12):1772-6. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03565. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity.用于早产儿呼吸暂停的经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD002272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002272.
4
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for RDS.对于患有呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)或有RDS风险的早产儿,早期给予表面活性剂并进行短暂通气与选择性给予表面活性剂及持续机械通气的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.
5
Lung recruitment and breathing pattern during variable versus continuous flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants: an evaluation of three devices.早产儿在可变流量与持续流量经鼻持续气道正压通气时的肺复张和呼吸模式:三种设备的评估
Pediatrics. 2001 Feb;107(2):304-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.304.
6
Unsynchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants after extubation.拔管后早产儿非同步鼻腔间歇性正压通气与鼻腔持续气道正压通气的比较
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Jun;27(9):926-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.846316. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
7
[Nasal CPAP versus mechanical ventilation in 28 to 32-week preterm infants with early surfactant administration].28至32周早产且早期给予表面活性剂的婴儿中鼻持续气道正压通气与机械通气的比较
Biomedica. 2014 Oct-Dec;34(4):612-23. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572014000400015.
8
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.早期使用表面活性剂并短暂通气与选择性使用表面活性剂及持续机械通气治疗患有或有呼吸窘迫综合征风险的早产儿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub2.
9
Nasal CPAP treatment of the respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective investigation of 10 new born infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征:对10例新生儿的前瞻性研究
Intensive Care Med. 1978 Jul;4(3):149-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01700257.
10
Effect on lung function of continuous positive airway pressure administered either by infant flow driver or a single nasal prong.婴儿气流驱动装置或单鼻导管持续气道正压通气对肺功能的影响。
Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Apr;159(4):289-92. doi: 10.1007/s004310050072.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of two different CPAP systems by tidal breathing parameters.通过潮气呼吸参数比较两种不同的持续气道正压通气系统。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jul;29(7):1134-40. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1785-0. Epub 2003 May 27.
2
A randomised control study comparing the Infant Flow Driver with nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants.一项比较婴儿气流驱动装置与经鼻持续气道正压通气对早产儿影响的随机对照研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Sep;85(2):F86-90. doi: 10.1136/fn.85.2.f86.
3
Risks and benefits of therapies for apnoea in premature infants.
早产儿呼吸暂停治疗的风险与益处
Drug Saf. 2000 Nov;23(5):363-79. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200023050-00002.