Suppr超能文献

一种对抗高血压治疗方案进行实际评估的方法。

An approach to realistic evaluation of antihypertensive regimes.

作者信息

Carlisle R, Akinkugbe O O, Basile U, Solagbade M E

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1977 Jan;53(615):7-11. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.53.615.7.

Abstract

Where practicable, all subjects found with onset-phase-four blood pressure of 90 mmHg or more after referral were allocated, on a random basis, to alternative antihypertensive regimes at a dosage related to response. Of those 110 receiving either guanethidine, methyldopa or debrisoquine, only the group on methyldopa had significantly reduced median blood pressure by two out of four criteria and after 6 months of therapy. It is nevertheless considered that by assessment of the total group more significant conclusions can be drawn for an eventual attempt to control hypertension on a community basis than by studies of highly selected groups treated under unusually favourable conditions.

摘要

在可行的情况下,所有转诊后发现发病四期血压达到或超过90mmHg的受试者,均根据反应情况随机分配至不同剂量的替代降压方案。在接受胍乙啶、甲基多巴或异喹胍治疗的110名受试者中,只有甲基多巴组在四个标准中的两个标准下,经过6个月治疗后,中位数血压有显著降低。然而,人们认为,通过对整个群体的评估,比通过对在异常有利条件下治疗的高度选择群体的研究,更能得出关于最终在社区基础上控制高血压的更有意义的结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验