Suppr超能文献

“不充分的”抗抑郁治疗的结果。

Outcomes of "inadequate" antidepressant treatment.

作者信息

Simon G E, Lin E H, Katon W, Saunders K, VonKorff M, Walker E, Bush T, Robinson P

机构信息

Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington 98101-1448, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Dec;10(12):663-70. doi: 10.1007/BF02602759.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine outcomes of primary care patients receiving low levels of antidepressant treatment.

DESIGN

Cohort study comparing patients receiving anti-depressant treatment within and below the recommended dosing range.

SETTING

Primary care clinics of a staff-model health maintenance organization.

PATIENTS

Primary care patients initiating antidepressant treatment for depression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 88 patients beginning antidepressant treatment, 49 (56%) used "adequate" doses for 30 days or more. Likelihood of "adequate" pharmacotherapy was not related to patient age, gender, medical comorbidity, or baseline depression severity. All the patients showed substantial clinical improvement after four months. Compared with those using "adequate" pharmacotherapy, the patients receiving low-intensity treatment had lower likelihood of clinical response (64% vs 84%; chi-square = 4.44; df = 1; p = 0.035). At four months, however, those receiving low-intensity and those receiving higher-intensity treatment did not differ significantly in either the score on the 20-item Symptom Checklist depression scale (18.91 and 15.72, respectively; F = 1.45; df = 1.86; p = 0.23) or the proportion with persistence of major depression (10% and 4%, respectively; chi-square = 1.30; df = 1; p = 0.25). A replication sample of 157 patients (assessed only at baseline and four months) yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

While the patients receiving recommended levels of pharmacotherapy showed somewhat higher improvement rates, many of the patients receiving "inadequate" treatment experienced good short-term outcomes. Efforts to increase the intensity of depression treatment in primary care should focus on the subgroup of patients who fail to respond to initial treatment.

摘要

目的

研究接受低剂量抗抑郁治疗的初级保健患者的治疗结果。

设计

队列研究,比较接受推荐剂量范围及低于推荐剂量范围抗抑郁治疗的患者。

地点

一家员工模式健康维护组织的初级保健诊所。

患者

开始接受抗抑郁治疗的初级保健抑郁症患者。

测量指标及主要结果

88例开始抗抑郁治疗的患者中,49例(56%)使用“足量”剂量达30天或更长时间。“足量”药物治疗的可能性与患者年龄、性别、合并症或基线抑郁严重程度无关。所有患者在4个月后均有显著临床改善。与接受“足量”药物治疗的患者相比,接受低强度治疗的患者临床反应的可能性较低(64%对84%;卡方检验=4.44;自由度=1;p=0.035)。然而,在4个月时,接受低强度治疗和高强度治疗的患者在20项症状自评量表抑郁评分(分别为18.91和15.72;F=1.45;自由度=1.86;p=0.23)或重度抑郁持续存在的比例(分别为10%和4%;卡方检验=1.30;自由度=1;p=0.25)方面均无显著差异。157例患者的重复样本(仅在基线和4个月时评估)得出了类似结果。

结论

虽然接受推荐药物治疗水平的患者改善率略高,但许多接受“不足量”治疗的患者也取得了良好的短期治疗结果。在初级保健中提高抑郁症治疗强度的努力应集中于对初始治疗无反应的患者亚组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验