Uchuya M, Graus F, Vega F, Reñé R, Delattre J Y
Department of Neurology, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;60(4):388-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.4.388.
To evaluate the effect of intravenous high dose human immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy on the clinical course and autoantibody titres of patients with neurological paraneoplastic syndromes.
Twenty two patients with paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis and sensory neuronopathy syndrome associated with anti-Hu antibodies (18) or paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) with anti-Yo antibodies (four), were treated with 1-26 (mean 5.8) cycles of IVIg. The Rankin scale was used to evaluate the response.
The only serious toxicity was one case of haemolytic anaemia. Twenty one patients were evaluable for therapeutic response. One patient, with subacute sensory neuronopathy (SSN), improved for at least 15 months, 10 remained stable (eight with anti-Hu and two with anti-Yo antibodies), and 10 deteriorated (eight with anti-Hu and two with anti-Yo antibodies). In seven of the 10 patients who stabilised, the syndrome had already made a plateau when the treatment was started but three patients (one with anti-Hu and two with anti-Yo antibodies) who had still been progressing stabilised for six, eight, and more than 48 months, including one patient with SSN who achieved stabilisation when the neurological dysfunction was only moderate (Rankin scale = 3). Another patient with SSN and initial stable response worsened when IVIg was reduced and improved when it was increased. No significant predictive factors of outcome could be identified but improvement or stabilisation was more frequent in patients with isolated involvement of the peripheral nervous system (62%) than in patients with evidence of CNS damage (37%) at the onset of treatment. Stabilisation in patients with CNS involvement was only achieved when the neurological dysfunction was already severe (Rankin scale > 3). The titres of autoantibodies did not change significantly.
Treatment with IVIg at the doses given in the present protocol was not effective in paraneoplastic CNS syndromes associated with antineuronal antibodies. The role of this regime in the treatment of SSN should be further evaluated.
评估静脉注射大剂量人免疫球蛋白(IVIg)疗法对神经副肿瘤综合征患者临床病程及自身抗体滴度的影响。
22例伴有抗Hu抗体的副肿瘤性脑脊髓炎和感觉神经元病综合征患者(18例)或伴有抗Yo抗体的副肿瘤性小脑变性(PCD)患者(4例),接受了1 - 26个周期(平均5.8个周期)的IVIg治疗。采用Rankin量表评估疗效。
唯一严重的毒性反应是1例溶血性贫血。21例患者可评估治疗反应。1例亚急性感觉神经元病(SSN)患者改善至少15个月,10例病情稳定(8例抗Hu抗体阳性,2例抗Yo抗体阳性),10例病情恶化(8例抗Hu抗体阳性,2例抗Yo抗体阳性)。在病情稳定的10例患者中,7例在开始治疗时综合征已处于平台期,但3例(1例抗Hu抗体阳性,2例抗Yo抗体阳性)仍在进展的患者病情稳定了6个月、8个月和超过48个月,其中1例SSN患者在神经功能障碍仅为中度(Rankin量表=3)时实现了病情稳定。另1例SSN患者最初反应稳定,但在IVIg减量时病情恶化,增加时病情改善。未发现显著的预后预测因素,但与治疗开始时中枢神经系统(CNS)有损伤证据的患者(37%)相比,单纯外周神经系统受累的患者(62%)改善或病情稳定更为常见。仅当中枢神经系统受累患者神经功能障碍已经严重(Rankin量表>3)时才实现病情稳定。自身抗体滴度无显著变化。
按照本方案给予剂量的IVIg治疗对与抗神经元抗体相关的副肿瘤性中枢神经系统综合征无效。该方案在SSN治疗中的作用应进一步评估。