Systematic reviews: what can they do for you?
作者信息
Duley L
机构信息
UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, England.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 1996 May;89(5):242-4. doi: 10.1177/014107689608900502.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Systematic reviews: what can they do for you?系统评价：它们能为你做什么？
J R Soc Med. 1996 May;89(5):242-4. doi: 10.1177/014107689608900502.
2
The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.随机对照试验与荟萃分析的比例：医学文献中的原始数据与系统评价
N Z Med J. 2007 Nov 9;120(1265):U2804.
3
Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.系统评价与荟萃分析中的方法学问题。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug(413):43-54. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079322.41006.5b.
4
Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
N Z Med J. 2007 Nov 30;120(1266):U2843.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology.系统评价和荟萃分析方法学。
Blood. 2010 Oct 28;116(17):3140-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-280883. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
6
Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology.随机试验、荟萃分析和系统评价：以风湿病学为例
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018 May;44(2):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2018.01.006.
7
Systematic reviews: what are they and why should we care?系统评价：它们是什么以及我们为何要关注？
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2002;7(2):147-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1015786920642.
8
Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.糖尿病干预措施系统评价的证据来源。
Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01645.x.
9
Cochrane systematic reviews in acupuncture: methodological diversity in database searching.针刺疗法的Cochrane系统评价：数据库检索中的方法学多样性
J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Aug;11(4):719-22. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.719.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. An effective, safe, simple, and inexpensive intervention.急性心肌梗死中静脉注射镁。一种有效、安全、简单且廉价的干预措施。
Circulation. 1993 Jun;87(6):2043-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.6.2043.
2
Publication bias: the problem that won't go away.发表偏倚：一个挥之不去的问题。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:135-46; discussion 146-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x.
3
Checklists for review articles.综述文章的核对清单。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 10;309(6955):648-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648.
4
Rationale for systematic reviews.系统评价的基本原理。
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
5
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis.最初以摘要形式呈现的研究结果的完整发表。一项荟萃分析。
JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):158-62.
6
An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care.对MEDLINE检索心理健康护理效果随机对照试验（RCTs）充分性的调查。
Psychol Med. 1994 Aug;24(3):741-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700027896.
7
Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。VI. 如何使用综述。循证医学工作组。
JAMA. 1994 Nov 2;272(17):1367-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.17.1367.
8
Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.诊断试验准确性的Meta分析方法
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00099-c.
9
Publication: an ethical imperative.发表：一项道德要求。
BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1313-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1313.
10
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.为系统评价识别相关研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jan 14;310(6972):126. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6972.126.
Zotero 插件