• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活质量与数量之间的权衡:癌症患者态度QQ问卷的编制

Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes.

作者信息

Stiggelbout A M, de Haes J C, Kiebert G M, Kievit J, Leer J W

机构信息

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):184-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600211.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9601600211
PMID:8778537
Abstract

The patient's perspective is of prime concern in weighing the benefits and side effects of oncologic treatment. Little is known about patients' preference and attitudes. The authors developed a short questionnaire to assess patient attitudes concerning trade-offs between quality of life and length, or quantity, of life (the QQ Questionnaire). The questionnaire turned out to be feasible for use in various groups of cancer patients. In a factor analysis, the questionnaire was shown to consist of two factors, a Q(uality) and a L(ength) factor. Values of Cronbach's alpha for the Q and L scales (consisting of four items each) were 0.68 and 0.79, respectively. Younger patients and patients who have children assigned relatively more importance to striving for prolonged survival. Contrary to our expectation, no association was found between scores on the two scales and time tradeoff utility scores. The QQ Questionnaire can be used in research settings to study patient attitudes and the stability and determinants of patients' preferences.

摘要

在权衡肿瘤治疗的益处和副作用时,患者的观点至关重要。对于患者的偏好和态度,我们了解得很少。作者设计了一份简短问卷,以评估患者对于生活质量与生命长度或数量之间权衡的态度(QQ问卷)。结果表明,该问卷适用于各类癌症患者群体。在一项因素分析中,该问卷显示由两个因素组成,即一个Q(质量)因素和一个L(长度)因素。Q量表和L量表(各由四个项目组成)的克朗巴哈系数值分别为0.68和0.79。年轻患者和有孩子的患者相对更重视延长生存期。与我们的预期相反,两个量表的得分与时间权衡效用得分之间未发现关联。QQ问卷可用于研究环境中,以研究患者的态度以及患者偏好的稳定性和决定因素。

相似文献

1
Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes.生活质量与数量之间的权衡:癌症患者态度QQ问卷的编制
Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):184-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600211.
2
Cancer patients' preferences for quantity or quality of life: German translation and validation of the quality and quantity questionnaire.癌症患者对生活质量的重视:质量和数量问卷的德文翻译及验证。
Oncol Res Treat. 2014;37(9):472-8. doi: 10.1159/000366250. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
3
Validation of the Polish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 15 - Palliative Care in patients with advanced cancer.验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷 - 核心 15 问卷 - 晚期癌症患者姑息治疗的波兰语版本。
Palliat Med. 2013 May;27(5):470-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216312458823. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
5
Deriving a patient-based utility index from a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire.从癌症特异性生活质量问卷中得出基于患者的效用指数。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):800-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00505.x.
6
Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care.验证用于评估姑息治疗患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版。
Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):889-96. doi: 10.1002/pon.1801. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
7
Illusions in advanced cancer: the effect of belief systems and attitudes on quality of life.晚期癌症中的幻觉:信仰体系和态度对生活质量的影响。
Psychooncology. 2004 Jan;13(1):26-36. doi: 10.1002/pon.722.
8
The "utility" of the Time Trade-Off method in cancer patients: feasibility and proportional Trade-Off.时间权衡法在癌症患者中的“效用”:可行性与比例权衡
J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Oct;48(10):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00011-r.
9
Cross-cultural verification of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire in mainland China.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C15-PAL问卷在中国内地的跨文化验证
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):401-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315593671. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
Utility assessment in cancer patients: adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores.癌症患者的效用评估:对生命年效用的时间权衡分数进行调整并与标准博弈分数比较。
Med Decis Making. 1994 Jan-Mar;14(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400110.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Quality-of-Life Data in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitors Using Four Assessment Tools.使用四种评估工具对接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的真实世界生活质量数据
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;17(5):818. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050818.
2
Immunologic Mechanisms of BCc1 Nanomedicine Synthesized by Nanochelating Technology in Breast Tumor-bearing Mice: Immunomodulation and Tumor Suppression.纳米螯合技术合成的 BCc1 纳米药物在荷乳腺癌小鼠中的免疫机制:免疫调节与肿瘤抑制。
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2024;24(19):1442-1456. doi: 10.2174/0118715206302153240723053521.
3
(Cost-)effectiveness of an individualised risk prediction tool (PERSARC) on patient's knowledge and decisional conflict among soft-tissue sarcomas patients: protocol for a parallel cluster randomised trial (the VALUE-PERSARC study).
个体化风险预测工具(PERSARC)对软组织肉瘤患者知识和决策冲突的成本效益:一项平行聚类随机试验的方案(VALUE-PERSARC 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 2;13(11):e074853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074853.
4
Through the Eyes of Patients: The Effect of Training General Practitioners and Nurses on Perceived Shared Decision-Making Support.从患者的角度看:培训全科医生和护士对感知到的共同决策支持的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231203693. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Quality Versus Quantity of Life: Beyond the Dichotomy.生活质量与生活数量:超越二分法
Palliat Med Rep. 2023 Jan 19;4(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2022.0058. eCollection 2023.
6
Priorities and preferences of advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients starting palliative chemotherapy: baseline results from the HOLISTIC study.晚期软组织肉瘤患者开始姑息化疗的优先事项和偏好:HOLLISTIC 研究的基线结果。
ESMO Open. 2021 Oct;6(5):100258. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100258. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
7
Health-related quality Of Life n patients with advanced Soft TIssue sarcomas treated with Chemotherapy (The HOLISTIC study): protocol for an international observational cohort study.接受化疗的晚期软组织肉瘤患者的健康相关生活质量(HOLISTIC 研究):一项国际观察性队列研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e035171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035171.
8
[Treatment decisions in oncology : Walking the tightrope between honesty and hope, lifetime, and quality of life].[肿瘤学中的治疗决策:在诚实与希望、生存期和生活质量之间走钢丝]
HNO. 2020 Jul;68(7):492-497. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00842-z.
9
Oncologist-patient-caregiver decision-making discussions in the context of advanced cancer in an Asian setting.在亚洲的晚期癌症背景下的肿瘤学家-患者-照顾者决策讨论。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):220-228. doi: 10.1111/hex.12994. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
10
Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review.癌症患者生命质量与生存时间考量的系统文献回顾。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jul;28(7):1367-1380. doi: 10.1002/pon.5054. Epub 2019 May 15.