Suppr超能文献

轻度偶发性喘息儿童的特应性、支气管高反应性和峰值流量变异性。

Atopy, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and peak flow variability in children with mild occasional wheezing.

作者信息

Roizin H, Reshef A, Katz I, Benzaray S, Lison M, Shiner R J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Respiratory Physiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center and Tel Aviv University Medical School, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Thorax. 1996 Mar;51(3):272-6. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.3.272.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children who suffer from recurrent wheezy episodes are often promptly classified as asthmatic. The aim of this study was to evaluate a population of mild wheezy children with repeatedly normal spirometric tests at rest for atopy, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and peak expiratory flow variability.

METHODS

Thirty nine children aged 6-16 years with 1-12 wheezy attacks during the previous year were recruited from a community paediatric primary health care clinic serving an urban Israeli population. The conditions for inclusion were a physician-diagnosed wheeze on auscultation and normal spirometric tests at rest on at least three occasions. Evaluation included skin prick tests for atopy and a physician-completed questionnaire. In addition, two tests of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) were performed--namely, exercise-induced bronchospasm and inhaled methacholine hyperresponsiveness--as well as diurnal variability of peak expiratory flow (PV).

RESULTS

One or more tests of BHR/PV were positive in 27 (69%) but repeatedly negative in 12 (31%). In terms of frequency of wheezing attacks, atopy, and questionnaire responses, there were no differences between BHR/PV and non-BHR/PV children, with the exception of a history of chest radiography proven pneumonia (only noted in the BHR/PV group). Overall, evidence of atopy (mainly indoor allergens) was noted in 21 (56%) of those tested and parental smoking in 29 (74%) of households. Thirty-two (82%) of the children complained of an exercise-related wheeze, yet exercise-induced bronchospasm was only demonstrated in nine (23%).

CONCLUSIONS

This selected group of wheezy children appears to be intermediate between a normal and clearly asthmatic population and, despite the recurrent wheezy attacks, some should probably not be classified as asthmatic by conventional criteria. Important aetiological factors in the symptomatology of these children may include parental smoking and atopy as well as other elements such as viral infections.

摘要

背景

患有反复喘息发作的儿童常常很快被归类为哮喘患儿。本研究的目的是评估一群轻度喘息儿童,这些儿童静息时肺功能测试反复正常,评估其特应性、支气管高反应性和呼气峰值流速变异性。

方法

从为以色列城市人口服务的社区儿科初级卫生保健诊所招募了39名6至16岁的儿童,他们在上一年有1至12次喘息发作。纳入条件为听诊时有医生诊断的喘息且至少三次静息时肺功能测试正常。评估包括特应性的皮肤点刺试验和医生填写的问卷。此外,进行了两项支气管高反应性(BHR)测试,即运动诱发性支气管痉挛和吸入乙酰甲胆碱高反应性,以及呼气峰值流速(PV)的日变化。

结果

27名(69%)儿童的一项或多项BHR/PV测试呈阳性,但12名(31%)儿童反复呈阴性。在喘息发作频率、特应性和问卷回答方面,BHR/PV儿童和非BHR/PV儿童之间没有差异,但胸部X线证实有肺炎病史的情况除外(仅在BHR/PV组中出现)。总体而言,21名(56%)受试儿童有特应性证据(主要是室内过敏原),29户(74%)家庭有父母吸烟情况。32名(82%)儿童主诉有运动相关喘息,但仅9名(23%)儿童出现运动诱发性支气管痉挛。

结论

这群经过挑选的喘息儿童似乎介于正常人群和明确的哮喘人群之间,尽管有反复的喘息发作,但一些儿童按传统标准可能不应被归类为哮喘。这些儿童症状学中的重要病因因素可能包括父母吸烟、特应性以及其他因素如病毒感染。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Exercised-induced asthma revisited.运动诱发性哮喘再探讨。
Respir Med. 1993 Jul;87(5):331-44. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(93)90046-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验