Suppr超能文献

使用多普勒超声系统进行最大速度估计的准确性。

Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems.

作者信息

Hoskins P R

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics and Medical Engineering, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 1996 Feb;69(818):172-7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-818-172.

Abstract

This study was performed in order to provide quantitative data on the estimation of maximum velocity made using modern Doppler ultrasound systems. This is important since the degree of stenosis within arteries is commonly assessed from the maximum velocity. A string phantom was used as the source of Doppler signals. This enables direct comparison between the Doppler estimated maximum velocity and the true filament velocity. Six modern commercial Doppler systems were used. Measurements were made under standard conditions for each probe. In addition a number of factors were varied in turn (beam-filament angle, filament depth, filament velocity and Doppler aperture position). Under standard conditions the maximum velocity was overestimated in all cases (0-29% error). For all measurements maximum velocity errors ranged from -4% to 47%. There was a large intraprobe variation in maximum velocity estimation (mean variation of 25%), and a large interprobe variation (mean variation of 25%), and a large interprobe variation (mean variation of 18%). These results indicate that, at present, errors in maximum velocity estimation may be directly translated into significant errors in the estimate of the degree of arterial stenosis made from velocity measurements. As a consequence, some patients may be incorrectly categorized. Consideration should be given to applying angle dependent correction factors to maximum velocity measurements, and to the use of conversion from Doppler frequency shift to velocity using the angle derived from the edge of the Doppler aperture.

摘要

进行本研究是为了提供关于使用现代多普勒超声系统估算最大速度的定量数据。这很重要,因为动脉狭窄程度通常是根据最大速度来评估的。使用线阵模型作为多普勒信号源。这使得能够直接比较多普勒估算的最大速度和真实细丝速度。使用了六种现代商用多普勒系统。在每个探头的标准条件下进行测量。此外,依次改变了一些因素(波束 - 细丝角度、细丝深度、细丝速度和多普勒孔径位置)。在标准条件下,所有情况下最大速度均被高估(误差为0 - 29%)。对于所有测量,最大速度误差范围为 - 4%至47%。在最大速度估算中存在较大的探头内差异(平均差异为25%),以及较大的探头间差异(平均差异为25%),还有较大的探头间差异(平均差异为18%)。这些结果表明,目前,最大速度估算中的误差可能直接转化为根据速度测量估算动脉狭窄程度时的显著误差。因此,一些患者可能会被错误分类。应考虑对最大速度测量应用角度相关的校正因子,并考虑使用从多普勒孔径边缘得出的角度将多普勒频移转换为速度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验