Falk C T, Ashley A, Lamb N, Sherman S L
Laboratory of Population Genetics, New York Blood Center, NY 10021, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(6):601-6. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120613.
We set out to apply conventional analytic methods to a GAW data set of nuclear families with an oligogenic disease that has a population prevalence of 0.023. We chose methods generally applied to disorders with at least one major gene. Our approaches included: 1) complex segregation analysis under two models of ascertainment, 2) linkage analysis assuming either a single-locus trait with possible genetic heterogeneity or a two-locus trait, and 3) allelic association studies using both a case/control approach and the haplotype relative risk (HRR) test. The association study was the only analysis of the three that provided evidence for genes playing a role in the etiology of this disorder.
我们着手将传统分析方法应用于一个患有寡基因疾病的核心家庭的GAW数据集,该疾病的人群患病率为0.023。我们选择了通常应用于至少有一个主要基因的疾病的方法。我们的方法包括:1)在两种确诊模型下进行复杂分离分析;2)假设为具有可能遗传异质性的单基因座性状或双基因座性状进行连锁分析;3)使用病例/对照方法和单倍型相对风险(HRR)检验进行等位基因关联研究。关联研究是这三种分析中唯一为基因在该疾病病因中发挥作用提供证据的分析。