Suppr超能文献

Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: a cost-benefit analysis.

作者信息

Audisio R A, Setti-Carraro P, Segala M, Capko D, Andreoni B, Tiberio G

机构信息

Istituto di Chirurgia d'Urgenza, Università di Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 1996 Jul;3(4):349-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02305664.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No conclusive evidence exists concerning the effectiveness of follow-up programs after curative surgery for colorectal cancer, and presently cost-benefit analyses have not indicated that follow-up strategies increase survival or quality of life.

METHODS

Five hundred five patients who survived curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma were closely followed for at least 4 years.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one (28%) patients had recurrence. Of these, 32 underwent one or more surgical procedures for cure, whereas 109 could only benefit from palliation. Eighteen were cured. The mean survival of all recurrent cases was 44.4 months. Of those operated on with curative intent, the mean survival was 69.3 months compared with 37.1 months in those operated on with palliative intent. Of those 18 patients who were cured by reoperative surgery, the average survival was 81.4 months. The overall follow-up cost was $1,914,900 (U.S.) for the 505 patients; $13,580 (U.S.) for each recurrence, $59,841 (U.S.) for each case treated for cure, and $136,779 (U.S.) for those effectively cured.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful postoperative monitoring is expensive yet effective when one considers that one-quarter of the detected recurrences were suitable for potentially curative second surgery; however, only 3.6% of the original group were effectively cured. Follow-up programs should be tailored according to the stage and site of the primary to reduce costs.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验