Apivatgaroon Adinun, Angthong Chayanin, Sanguanjit Prakasit, Chernchujit Bancha
a Department of Orthopaedics , Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University , Pathumthani , Thailand.
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2161-4. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114035. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
To develop a Thai version of the Kujala score and show the evaluation of the validity and reliability of the score.
The Thai version of the Kujala score was developed using the forward-backward translation protocol. The 49 PFPS patients answered the Thai version of questionnaires including the Kujala score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. The validity between the scores has been tested. The reliability was assessed using test-retest reliability and internal consistency.
The Thai version of the Kujala score showed a good correlation with Thai IKDC Subjective Knee Form (Pearson's correlation coefficient; r = 0.74: p < 0.01) and moderate correlation with the Thai SF-36 subscales of physical component summary, total score and role physical (r = 0.586, 0.571 and 0.524, respectively: p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.908 (p < 0.001; 95% CI [0.842-0.947]). The internal consistency was strong with Cronbach's alpha of 0.952 (p < 0.001). No floor and ceiling effects were observed.
The Thai version of the Kujala score has shown good validity and reliability. This score can be effectively used for evaluating Thai patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Implications for Rehabilitation The Kujala score is a self-administered questionnaire for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). The validity and reliability of the Thai version of Kujala are compatible with other versions (Turkish, Chinese and Persian version). The Thai version of Kujala has been shown to have validity and reliability in Thai PFPS patients and can be used for clinical evaluation and also in the research work.
开发库亚拉评分的泰语版本，并展示该评分的有效性和可靠性评估。
采用前后翻译协议开发库亚拉评分的泰语版本。49例髌股疼痛综合征（PFPS）患者回答了泰语版问卷，包括库亚拉评分、简短健康调查问卷36项简表（SF-36）和国际膝关节文献委员会（IKDC）主观膝关节表。对各评分之间的有效性进行了测试。使用重测信度和内部一致性评估可靠性。
库亚拉评分的泰语版本与泰语IKDC主观膝关节表显示出良好的相关性（皮尔逊相关系数；r = 0.74：p < 0.01），与泰语SF-36身体成分汇总量表、总分和身体功能角色量表呈中度相关（分别为r = 0.586、0.571和0.524：p < 0.01）。重测信度极佳，组内相关系数为0.908（p < 0.001；95%可信区间[0.842 - 0.947]）。内部一致性较强，克朗巴哈系数为0.952（p < 0.001）。未观察到地板效应和天花板效应。
库亚拉评分的泰语版本显示出良好的有效性和可靠性。该评分可有效用于评估泰国髌股疼痛综合征患者。康复意义 库亚拉评分是用于髌股疼痛综合征（PFPS）患者的自填式问卷。库亚拉评分泰语版本的有效性和可靠性与其他版本（土耳其语、中文和波斯语版本）相当。库亚拉评分泰语版本已证明在泰国PFPS患者中具有有效性和可靠性，可用于临床评估及研究工作。
