Laprade J A, Culham E G
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon.
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Nov;16(7):780-8. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr553oa.
To develop a scale for estimating the severity of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and to determine its reliability and validity.
The PFPS Severity Scale (PSS) was developed following a literature search, input from clinicians, and pilot testing in people with PFPS. The final version of the instrument encompasses 10 statements regarding PFPS pain in a visual analogue format. Reliability and validity of the new scale were determined in a PFPS population.
All testing was performed at the Canadian Forces Base Kingston, Physiotherapy Department.
Twenty-nine military subjects (7 female) between the ages of 20 and 48 (32 years +/- 8.9) with subjective and objective findings consistent with PFPS were recruited. Twenty-four of the participants (6 female, 31.8 years +/- 9.4) participated in the reliability phase of the study.
Reliability of the PSS was determined by comparing the scores obtained on two test days (24 hours apart). Convergent validity of the PSS was determined by comparing data from the PSS with two established knee scales: the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Osteoarthritis Index and the Hughston Foundation subjective knee scale.
Test-retest reliability was excellent (Spearman's rho = 0.95, p < 0.0001). The correlations between the PSS and the WOMAC and Hughston scales were strong (rho = 0.72 and 0.83, p < 0.001 respectively).
The PSS is reliable and has demonstrated convergent validity making it a useful tool for monitoring rehabilitative or surgical outcomes in clients with PFPS.
制定一种用于评估髌股疼痛综合征(PFPS)严重程度的量表,并确定其信度和效度。
PFPS严重程度量表(PSS)是在文献检索、临床医生的意见以及对PFPS患者进行预试验的基础上制定的。该量表的最终版本包含10条关于PFPS疼痛的陈述,采用视觉模拟格式。在PFPS患者群体中确定了新量表的信度和效度。
所有测试均在加拿大金斯敦军事基地理疗科进行。
招募了29名年龄在20至48岁(32岁±8.9)之间、主观和客观检查结果符合PFPS的军事人员(7名女性)。其中24名参与者(6名女性,31.8岁±9.4)参与了研究的信度阶段。
通过比较在两个测试日(相隔24小时)获得的分数来确定PSS的信度。通过将PSS的数据与两个已确立的膝关节量表:WOMAC(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学)骨关节炎指数和休斯顿基金会主观膝关节量表进行比较,来确定PSS的收敛效度。
重测信度极佳(Spearman相关系数ρ = 0.95,p < 0.0001)。PSS与WOMAC量表和休斯顿量表之间的相关性很强(ρ分别为0.72和0.83,p < 0.001)。
PSS可靠且已证明具有收敛效度,使其成为监测PFPS患者康复或手术效果的有用工具。