Munroe-Blum H, Collins E, McCleary L, Nuttall S
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Schizophr Res. 1996 May;20(1-2):211-9. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(96)88527-6.
The social dysfunction index (SDI) is a new measure designed to assess social dysfunction in schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses. It is intended to serve clinical and research purposes. Raters can be readily trained and there is low respondent burden with its use. Good psychometric properties were identified in three studies (sample sizes 33, 67 and 113). The SDI assesses a wide and comprehensive range of social functioning. It includes objective assessment of dysfunction and subjective client assessment of satisfaction with functioning. It produces a summary score, a satisfaction score and a score for each of the nine components of social functioning assessed. Internal consistency is good (alpha = 0.80). Inter-rater reliability is high (r = 0.96). Use of the component scores was confirmed by factor analysis. There is modest correlation with other measures of social functioning. Evidence of construct validity is demonstrated by findings of differences in social dysfunction between subjects who lived independently vs. those who lived in boarding homes; differences between subjects who were unemployed vs. subjects who were employed; and independence of social functioning from both age and education.
社会功能障碍指数(SDI)是一项旨在评估精神分裂症及其他严重精神疾病社会功能障碍的新指标。它旨在用于临床和研究目的。评分者易于培训,使用该指标时被调查者负担较小。在三项研究(样本量分别为33、67和113)中确定了良好的心理测量特性。SDI评估广泛且全面的社会功能。它包括对功能障碍的客观评估以及服务对象对功能满意度的主观评估。它会生成一个总分、一个满意度得分以及对所评估的九个社会功能组成部分中每一个部分的得分。内部一致性良好(α = 0.80)。评分者间信度较高(r = 0.96)。通过因子分析证实了各组成部分得分的用途。与其他社会功能测量指标存在适度相关性。独立生活的受试者与寄宿家庭生活的受试者之间社会功能障碍的差异;失业受试者与就业受试者之间的差异;以及社会功能与年龄和教育的独立性,这些研究结果证明了结构效度。