• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

显微外科手术与标准腰椎间盘切除术的对照研究。

A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.

作者信息

Henriksen L, Schmidt K, Eskesen V, Jantzen E

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Jun;10(3):289-93. doi: 10.1080/02688699650040160.

DOI:10.1080/02688699650040160
PMID:8799541
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether a microsurgical discectomy (MS), compared with a standard lumbar discectomy (SD), could reduce the stay at the hospital or the postoperative morbidity. The study was prospective and of 79 patients with "virgin' lumbar radiculopathy from only one nerve root, 39 were randomized to MS and 40 to SD. All patients had positive myelography or CT findings. The fascia incision was 31 and 70 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, but the skin incision was of the same length in both groups to blind the study. For the MS and SD group of patients, the median operation time was 48 and 35 min (p < 0.0001), and the stay at the hospital was 5.2 and 4.6 days, respectively. The two groups were not different in sex, age, localization or type of herniated discs. Use of analgesic medicine and the presence of pain in the back or legs pre- and postoperative was the same. We conclude that in a controlled and prospective study, reducing the fascia incision and the muscular dissection from a median of 70-31 mm, does not shorten the length of a stay at a hospital and it has no influence on postoperative morbidity.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估与标准腰椎间盘切除术(SD)相比,显微外科椎间盘切除术(MS)是否能缩短住院时间或降低术后发病率。该研究为前瞻性研究,79例仅一根神经根出现“原发性”腰椎神经根病的患者被随机分为两组,39例接受MS,40例接受SD。所有患者脊髓造影或CT检查结果均为阳性。筋膜切口分别为31mm和70mm(p<0.0001),但两组皮肤切口长度相同,以确保研究的盲法。MS组和SD组患者的中位手术时间分别为48分钟和35分钟(p<0.0001),住院时间分别为5.2天和4.6天。两组在性别、年龄、椎间盘突出的部位或类型方面无差异。术前和术后使用镇痛药的情况以及背部或腿部疼痛的情况相同。我们得出结论,在一项对照前瞻性研究中,将筋膜切口和肌肉分离从平均70mm减少到31mm,并不会缩短住院时间,也不会对术后发病率产生影响。

相似文献

1
A controlled study of microsurgical versus standard lumbar discectomy.显微外科手术与标准腰椎间盘切除术的对照研究。
Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Jun;10(3):289-93. doi: 10.1080/02688699650040160.
2
Three years experience with microsurgical technique in treatment of protruded lumbar disc.显微外科技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的三年经验
J Neurosurg Sci. 1984 Jan-Mar;28(1):25-31.
3
[Peculiarities of the microsurgical discectomy for hernia of the low-lumbar vertebral column].[腰椎间盘突出症显微外科切除术的特点]
Klin Khir. 2005 Sep(9):52-4.
4
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
Evaluation of patients with suspected herniated lumbar discs with radiculopathy.对疑似腰椎间盘突出症伴神经根病患者的评估。
Eur Neurol. 1994;34(1):53-60. doi: 10.1159/000117010.
6
Prevention of recurrent radicular pain after lumbar disc surgery: a prospective study.腰椎间盘手术后复发性神经根性疼痛的预防:一项前瞻性研究。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;92:151-4. doi: 10.1007/3-211-27458-8_33.
7
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
8
Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis-induced radicular compression: nonfusion-related decompression in selected patients without hypermobility on flexion-extension radiographs.
J Neurosurg. 2002 Oct;97(3 Suppl):281-6. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.3.0281.
9
Intraoperative measurements of nerve root blood flow during discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症椎间盘切除术期间神经根血流的术中测量
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00020.
10
A prospective, randomized study comparing the results of open discectomy with those of video-assisted arthroscopic microdiscectomy.一项前瞻性随机研究,比较开放性椎间盘切除术与视频辅助关节镜下显微椎间盘切除术的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jul;81(7):958-65. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199907000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Immediate Effects, Detailed Clinical Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors of Chemonucleolysis Using Condoliase for Lumbar Disc Herniation.胶原酶溶解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的即刻效果、详细临床疗效及预后因素。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2024 Jun 15;64(6):230-240. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0009. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Evaluation of Dram Score as a Predictor of Poor Postoperative Outcome in Spine Surgery.评估Dram评分作为脊柱手术术后不良结局预测指标的价值
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 26;9(12):3825. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123825.
3
Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial.
开窗髓核切除术与显微镜下开窗髓核切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的随机对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 15;21(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03396-x.
4
Unilateral discectomy: outcomes, postoperative pain, complications.单侧椎间盘切除术:结果、术后疼痛及并发症
Eur J Transl Myol. 2019 Oct 29;29(4):8545. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2019.8545.
5
Open Discectomy vs. Microdiscectomy: Results from 519 Patients Operated for Lumbar Disc Herniation.开放性椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术:519例腰椎间盘突出症手术患者的结果
Eurasian J Med. 2018 Oct;50(3):178-181. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.18016.
6
Patients at the Highest Risk for Reherniation Following Lumbar Discectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.多中心随机对照试验中腰椎间盘切除术后再发疝风险最高的患者。
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Apr 16;3(2):e0037. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00037. eCollection 2018 Jun 28.
7
Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial.通过使用一种新型的椎间盘环闭合装置,可以减少与不良临床和社会经济结果相关的腰椎间盘切除术后再次手术:一项为期2年的随机对照试验结果
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 26;10:349-357. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S164129. eCollection 2018.
8
Neonatal mouse intervertebral discs heal with restored function following herniation injury.新生儿鼠椎间盘在疝出损伤后可通过恢复功能来愈合。
FASEB J. 2018 Sep;32(9):4753-4762. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701492R. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Comparing the Incidence of Index Level Fusion Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy.比较微创与开放腰椎间盘显微切除术术后索引节段融合的发生率。
Global Spine J. 2018 Feb;8(1):11-16. doi: 10.1177/2192568217718818. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
10
Performance of an Annular Closure Device in a 'Real-World', Heterogeneous, At-Risk, Lumbar Discectomy Population.环形闭合装置在“真实世界”、异质性、高危腰椎间盘切除人群中的性能表现
Cureus. 2017 Nov 6;9(11):e1824. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1824.