De Wildt M J, Hubregtse M, Ogden C, Carter S S, Debruyne F M, De la Rosette J J
Department of Urology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Br J Urol. 1996 Feb;77(2):221-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1996.82511.x.
To determine the placebo effect of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).
A prospective, randomized sham-controlled study in 93 patients (mean age 65, range 50-88) was conducted at two centres comparing TUMT or a sham treatment. Patients randomized to receive sham treatment underwent the same initial procedure as for TUMT, but the complete procedure was simulated on the visual display with no application of microwave energy. If the patient's condition had not improved after 3 months, a second genuine TUMT treatment was given at the patient's request.
After 3 months there were significant clinical and statistical differences in efficacy between the groups; 62% and 18% of patients had a > 50% improvement in symptom score in the treated and sham groups, respectively (P = 0.001). The corresponding changes in flow rate were 36% and 11% (P = 0.002), respectively. After 1 year, 63 patients were divided into those that had TUMT initially, those that had sham initially but subsequently had TUMT and those whose sham procedure had led to sufficient clinical improvement to require no further treatment. The two treated groups had a significant improvement over the sham group.
The benefit from TUMT cannot be due to a placebo effect alone.
确定经尿道微波热疗(TUMT)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPE)的安慰剂效应。
在两个中心对93例患者(平均年龄65岁,范围50 - 88岁)进行了一项前瞻性、随机、假手术对照研究,比较TUMT与假手术治疗。随机接受假手术治疗的患者接受与TUMT相同的初始操作,但在视觉显示器上模拟整个过程,不施加微波能量。如果患者病情在3个月后没有改善,应患者要求给予第二次真正的TUMT治疗。
3个月后,两组在疗效上存在显著的临床和统计学差异;治疗组和假手术组分别有62%和18%的患者症状评分改善超过50%(P = 0.001)。流速的相应变化分别为36%和11%(P = 0.002)。1年后,63例患者被分为最初接受TUMT的患者、最初接受假手术但随后接受TUMT的患者以及假手术操作导致临床改善充分无需进一步治疗的患者。两个治疗组与假手术组相比有显著改善。
TUMT的益处不能仅归因于安慰剂效应。