Herala M, Stålenheim G, Boman G
Department of Lung Medicine, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Ups J Med Sci. 1995;100(3):223-32. doi: 10.3109/03009739509178908.
We have studied the effects of positive expiratory pressure (PEP), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and hyperventilation on 9 hypoxemic and hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. All the patients were in a stable condition and received continuous oxygen. PEP and nasal CPAP were each given for 3 days in random order once every hour during the day and 3 times overnight. The effects of treatment were compared with a 3-day period in which the patients had no treatment for CO2 elimination. The effects were based on transcutaneous measurements of PO2 (PtcO2), PCO2 (PtcCO2) and SO2 (SpO2) and arterial blood gas measurements. The transcutaneous measurements showed that the PEP treatment reduced the PtcCO2 in COPD patients by 0.5 kPa and the CPAP treatment reduced it by 0.1 kPa (p < 0.05). The hyperventilation maneuver caused a decrease in the PtcCO2 of 0.7 kPa. The nocturnal treatments and measurements were all similar to the daytime measurements; the PtcCO2 decreased by 0.6 kPa using PEP and by 0.3 kPa using CPAP (p < 0.01). This indicated that all 3 methods reduced the PtcCO2, but only in the short term as the effects lasted for less than 4 min. COPD patients had no "late response" after any form of treatment. Arterial blood gases in COPD patients showed an elevation in PaCO2 (1.2 kPa) and a decrease in PaO2 and SaO2 during the night (11 pm to 7 am) without treatment. After 3 days of treatment with PEP and CPAP, the same pattern was noticed. The PaCO2 increased with both therapies, 1.3 kPa with PEP and 0.6 kPa with CPAP. Our data indicate that the effects were not of clinical significance and there is no justification for treating stable hypercapnic COPD patients with these methods.
我们研究了呼气末正压(PEP)、持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和过度通气对9例低氧血症合并高碳酸血症的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的影响。所有患者病情稳定,均接受持续吸氧治疗。PEP和经鼻CPAP各治疗3天,治疗顺序随机,白天每小时进行1次,夜间进行3次。将治疗效果与患者3天未进行二氧化碳清除治疗的时期进行比较。疗效基于经皮测量的氧分压(PtcO2)、二氧化碳分压(PtcCO2)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)以及动脉血气测量。经皮测量显示,PEP治疗使COPD患者的PtcCO2降低了0.5 kPa,CPAP治疗使其降低了0.1 kPa(p<0.05)。过度通气操作使PtcCO2降低了0.7 kPa。夜间治疗和测量结果与白天测量结果相似;使用PEP时PtcCO2降低了0.6 kPa,使用CPAP时降低了0.3 kPa(p<0.01)。这表明所有3种方法均降低了PtcCO2,但仅在短期内有效,因为效果持续时间不到4分钟。COPD患者在任何形式的治疗后均无“延迟反应”。未治疗时,COPD患者夜间(晚上11点至早上7点)的动脉血气显示PaCO2升高(1.2 kPa),PaO2和SaO2降低。经过3天的PEP和CPAP治疗后,出现了相同的模式。两种治疗方法均使PaCO2升高,PEP治疗时升高1.3 kPa,CPAP治疗时升高0.6 kPa。我们的数据表明,这些效果无临床意义,且没有理由用这些方法治疗稳定期高碳酸血症COPD患者。