• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构居民在幸福感量表上对健康状态的偏好。

Long-term care residents' preferences for health states on the quality of well-being scale.

作者信息

Hays R D, Siu A L, Keeler E, Marshall G N, Kaplan R M, Simmons S, el Mouchi D, Schnelle J F

机构信息

RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. Ronald

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1996 Jul-Sep;16(3):254-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600310.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9601600310
PMID:8818124
Abstract

The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) quantifies health-related quality of life with a single number that represents community-based preferences for combinations of symptom/problem complexes, mobility, physical activity, and social activity. The aim of this study was to compare preferences of a long-term care population with those of the general population, determine whether preferences vary by the age of the hypothetical (target) person depicted in the health-state case description, and derive weights for new symptom/problem complexes of particular relevance to frail, older individuals. A sample of 38 female and 12 male long-term care residents with an average age of 86 years was asked to rate health-state scenarios that combined the four health domains of the QWB. This sample rates quality of life 0.10 units lower on average (on a 0-1 scale) than did the general population sample from which the QWB preferences were originally developed. Ratings of the same health state for younger versus older target persons did not differ significantly (all p values > 0.05 for t statistics). Weights derived for 11 new symptom/problem complexes were: disturbed sleep (-0.252), sit-to-stand requires maximal effort (-0.259), lonely (-0.265), walking a short distance causes extreme fatigue (-0.273), agitated (-0.284), hallucinating (-0.355), incontinent (0-359), unable to control one's behavior (-0.36), urinary catheter (-0.374), restrained in bed or chair (-0.374), and feeding tube through the nose or stomach (-0.402). These new weights increase the relevance of the QWB for cost-utility evaluations of health interventions for long-term care residents.

摘要

幸福质量量表(QWB)用一个单一数字对与健康相关的生活质量进行量化,该数字代表了基于社区对症状/问题复合体、活动能力、身体活动和社交活动组合的偏好。本研究的目的是比较长期护理人群与普通人群的偏好,确定偏好是否因健康状态案例描述中所描绘的假设(目标)人物的年龄而有所不同,并得出与体弱的老年人特别相关的新症状/问题复合体的权重。对38名女性和12名男性长期护理居民(平均年龄86岁)的样本进行调查,要求他们对结合了QWB四个健康领域的健康状态情景进行评分。该样本对生活质量的评分平均(在0 - 1量表上)比最初制定QWB偏好的普通人群样本低0.10个单位。对年轻与年长目标人物相同健康状态的评分没有显著差异(所有t统计量的p值均> 0.05)。为11个新的症状/问题复合体得出的权重分别为:睡眠障碍(-0.252)、从坐姿到站姿需要最大努力(-0.259)、孤独(-0.265)、短距离行走导致极度疲劳(-0.273)、烦躁不安(-0.284)、幻觉(-0.355)、失禁(0 - 359)、无法控制自己的行为(-0.36)、导尿管(-0.374)、在床上或椅子上受到约束(-0.374)以及经鼻或胃的饲管(-0.402)。这些新权重提高了QWB在长期护理居民健康干预成本效用评估中的相关性。

相似文献

1
Long-term care residents' preferences for health states on the quality of well-being scale.长期护理机构居民在幸福感量表上对健康状态的偏好。
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jul-Sep;16(3):254-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600310.
2
Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment.长期护理服务偏好:来自离散选择实验的意愿支付估计。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1317-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.027. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
3
Urinary incontinence treatment preferences in long-term care.长期护理中尿失禁的治疗偏好
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jun;49(6):710-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49146.x.
4
Long-term care preferences among older adults: a moving target?老年人的长期护理偏好:一个不断变化的目标?
J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(2):182-200. doi: 10.1080/08959420801977574.
5
Quality of life in the nursing home: perspectives of younger and older residents.养老院中的生活质量:年轻与年长居民的观点
Can J Aging. 2007 Winter;26(4):403-10. doi: 10.3138/cja.26.4.403.
6
Daily life after moving into a care home--experiences from older people, relatives and contact persons.入住养老院后的日常生活——老年人、亲属及联系人的经历
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1712-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01703.x.
7
Mobility of Vulnerable Elders study: effect of the sit-to-stand activity on mobility, function, and quality of life.弱势老年人的活动能力研究:从坐立活动对活动能力、功能和生活质量的影响
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Feb;16(2):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
8
Fulfilled preferences, perceived control, life satisfaction, and loneliness in elderly long-term care residents.满足的偏好、感知控制、生活满意度和老年人长期护理居民的孤独感。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Feb;22(2):183-189. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1244804. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
The effect of housing on perceptions of quality of life of older adults participating in a medicaid long-term care demonstration project.住房对参与医疗补助长期护理示范项目的老年人生活质量认知的影响。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2007;49(3):205-28. doi: 10.1300/J083v49n03_12.
10
Activity involvement and quality of life of people at different stages of dementia in long term care facilities.长期护理机构中处于不同痴呆阶段的人群的活动参与度和生活质量
Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(1):100-9. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1049116. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health state descriptions, valuations and individuals' capacity to walk: a comparative evaluation of preference-based instruments in the context of spinal cord injury.健康状态描述、估值与个体行走能力:脊髓损伤背景下基于偏好的工具的比较评估
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2481-2496. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1297-3. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
2
Factors Associated With Changes in Perceived Quality of Life Among Elderly Recipients of Long-Term Services and Supports.长期服务与支持老年受助者生活质量感知变化的相关因素
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
Health state preferences are equivalent in the United States and Trinidad and Tobago.
健康状况偏好(Health state preferences)在美国和特立尼达和多巴哥(Trinidad and Tobago)是等效的。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Jun;19(5):729-38. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9630-8. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
4
A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.通用生活质量量表的比较综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jan;17(1):13-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002.