• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果分析:理论与应用

Causal analysis: theory and application.

作者信息

Peyrot M

机构信息

Center for Social and Community Research, Loyola College, Baltimore, Maryland 21210, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Feb;21(1):3-24. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/21.1.3.

DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/21.1.3
PMID:8820070
Abstract

Identified opportunities to make statistical analysis more closely approximate the conceptual issues that are apparent in current research in pediatric psychology. The paper proceeds by explicating the logic of multivariate analysis and its application to causal modeling. Causal modeling techniques are discussed and the ease of employing these techniques is evaluated. Several articles from earlier issues of this journal are reviewed in terms of the application of causal analysis.

摘要

确定了一些机会,以使统计分析更紧密地贴近当前儿科心理学研究中明显的概念性问题。本文通过阐述多元分析的逻辑及其在因果建模中的应用来展开。讨论了因果建模技术,并评估了应用这些技术的难易程度。根据因果分析的应用对该期刊早期几期的几篇文章进行了综述。

相似文献

1
Causal analysis: theory and application.因果分析:理论与应用
J Pediatr Psychol. 1996 Feb;21(1):3-24. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/21.1.3.
2
Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures.迈向中介变量和调节变量研究中的术语、概念及统计清晰度:来自儿童临床与儿科心理学文献的示例
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Aug;65(4):599-610. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.4.599.
3
Causal Modeling in WOC Nursing Research.伤口、造口及失禁护理研究中的因果模型
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2003 Jul;30(4):168-74. doi: 10.1067/mjw.2003.130.
4
Three approaches to causal inference in regression discontinuity designs.回归断点设计中因果推断的三种方法。
Epidemiology. 2015 Mar;26(2):e28-30; discussion e30. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000256.
5
Assessing causality in multivariate accident models.评估多元事故模型中的因果关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.018. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
6
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: analytic methods to improve causal inference from nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part III.比较实效研究的良好研究实践:利用二次数据源提高非随机治疗效果研究中因果推断的分析方法:ISPOR 回顾性数据库分析良好研究实践工作组报告--第三部分。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1062-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00602.x. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
7
A call for theory to support the use of causal-formative indicators: A commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos (2017).呼吁理论支持因果形成指标的使用:对 Bollen 和 Diamantopoulos(2017)的评论。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):597-604. doi: 10.1037/met0000115.
8
[Comparison of selected causality theories].[选定因果关系理论的比较]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Dec;73(12):880-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291198. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
9
The logic of causation in epidemiology.流行病学中的因果逻辑。
Scand J Soc Med. 1996 Mar;24(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/140349489602400103.
10
A copula approach to assessing Granger causality.一种用于评估格兰杰因果关系的Copula方法。
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The multinational onversations and eactions round evere ypoglycemia (CRASH) study: Impact of health care provider communications and recommendations on people with diabetes.关于严重低血糖的多国沟通与反应(CRASH)研究:医疗服务提供者的沟通及建议对糖尿病患者的影响
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2022 Feb 16;27:100295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2022.100295. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Anhedonia, screen time, and substance use in early adolescents: A longitudinal mediation analysis.快感缺失、屏幕时间与青少年早期的物质使用:一项纵向中介分析。
J Adolesc. 2020 Jan;78:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
Relationship between social media engagement and e-cigarette policy support.
社交媒体参与度与电子烟政策支持之间的关系。
Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Dec 14;9:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2018.100155. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Factors explaining variation in self-esteem among persons with type 1 diabetes and elevated HbA1c.解释 1 型糖尿病患者和糖化血红蛋白升高者中自尊差异的因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0201006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201006. eCollection 2018.
5
Self-reported diabetes self-management competence and support from healthcare providers in achieving autonomy are negatively associated with diabetes distress in adults with Type 1 diabetes.自我报告的糖尿病自我管理能力以及医疗服务提供者在实现自主性方面提供的支持,与1型糖尿病成年患者的糖尿病困扰呈负相关。
Diabet Med. 2015 Nov;32(11):1513-9. doi: 10.1111/dme.12818. Epub 2015 Jul 4.
6
Volunteerism and self-selection bias in human positron emission tomography neuroimaging research.志愿者参与和自我选择偏倚对人类正电子发射断层扫描神经影像学研究的影响。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2013 Jun;7(2):163-76. doi: 10.1007/s11682-012-9210-3.
7
Effect of problem-solving-based diabetes self-management training on diabetes control in a low income patient sample.基于问题解决的糖尿病自我管理培训对低收入患者糖尿病控制的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Sep;26(9):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1689-6. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
8
How does treatment satisfaction work?: Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and preference.治疗满意度是如何起作用的?:构建治疗满意度和偏好的决定因素模型。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1411-7. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2256. Epub 2009 May 26.
9
BMI as a moderator of perceived stress and emotional eating in adolescents.身体质量指数作为青少年感知压力和情绪化进食的调节因素。
Eat Behav. 2008 Apr;9(2):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
10
Early markers of language and attention: mutual contributions and the impact of parent-infant interactions.语言和注意力的早期指标:相互作用以及亲子互动的影响
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2008 Mar;39(1):9-26. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0067-4. Epub 2007 Jun 15.