Suppr超能文献

用于危重症患者静息能量消耗的5分钟稳态间接测热法方案的验证

Validation of a 5-minute steady state indirect calorimetry protocol for resting energy expenditure in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Frankenfield D C, Sarson G Y, Blosser S A, Cooney R N, Smith J S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Nutrition, Pennsylvania State University, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey 17033, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Nutr. 1996 Aug;15(4):397-402. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1996.10718615.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Numerous protocols are used for indirect calorimetry in research and clinical settings. The objective of the current study was to validate in critically ill patients an abbreviated protocol that uses five consecutive stable 1-minute readings of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) in a range of +/- 5%, versus a more standard protocol that uses 30 consecutive stable one minute readings of VO2, VCO2, and VE in a range of +/- 10%.

METHODS

Indirect calorimetry was performed on resting, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. The first 5-minute period in which coefficients of variation for VO2, VCO2, and VE were < or = 5% was compared to the first 30-minute period in which coefficients of variation for these variables were < or = 10%.

RESULTS

Thirty-four critically ill patients were studied. Twenty four patients (70%) successfully completed both protocols (Success Group). Eighteen percent of subjects completed neither the abbreviated nor the 30 minute protocol, and 12% completed only one protocol (Fail Group). The Success Group was marked by a higher incidence of sedation and/or medical paralysis. There were no significant differences in VE, VO2, VCO2, respiratory quotient, or energy expenditure between the protocols in the Success Group or the Fail Group. Coefficients of determination (R2) for VO2 and VCO2 between the two methods in the Success Group were 0.99. In the Fail Group, R2 values ranged from 0.75 for VCO2 to 0.91 for VO2.

CONCLUSION

In sedated, mechanically ventilated patients, an indirect calorimetry test of five consecutive 1-minute periods with coefficient of variation < or = 5% is equivalent to a longer test consisting of 30 consecutive 1-minute periods with coefficient of variation < or = 10%.

摘要

目的

在研究和临床环境中,多种方案被用于间接测热法。本研究的目的是在重症患者中验证一种简化方案,该方案使用连续五次稳定的1分钟耗氧量(VO2)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)和分钟通气量(VE)读数,波动范围为±5%,并与一种更标准的方案进行比较,后者使用连续30次稳定的1分钟VO2、VCO2和VE读数,波动范围为±10%。

方法

对静息、机械通气的重症患者进行间接测热法。将VO2、VCO2和VE变异系数≤5%的首个5分钟时段与这些变量变异系数≤10%的首个30分钟时段进行比较。

结果

对34例重症患者进行了研究。24例患者(70%)成功完成了两种方案(成功组)。18%的受试者既未完成简化方案也未完成30分钟方案,12%的受试者仅完成了一种方案(失败组)。成功组的特点是镇静和/或药物性麻痹的发生率较高。成功组或失败组中,两种方案在VE、VO2、VCO2、呼吸商或能量消耗方面均无显著差异。成功组中两种方法之间VO2和VCO2的决定系数(R2)为0.99。在失败组中,R2值范围从VCO2的0.75到VO2的0.91。

结论

在接受镇静、机械通气的患者中,连续五个1分钟时段且变异系数≤5%的间接测热法测试等同于由连续30个1分钟时段且变异系数≤10%组成的更长测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验