Naik S S, More P R
Acworth Leprosy Hospital Society for Research, Rehabilitation & Education in Leprosy, Wadala, Bombay.
Indian J Lepr. 1996 Apr-Jun;68(2):161-6.
One hundred nineteen smear-positive leprosy cases registered at an urban leprosy centre in Bombay in 1991 were followed for three years to study the 'drop-out' pattern in them and judge the utility of some corrective measures for the same. The measures included having maps showing exact location of the patient's residence, paying home visits on registration days and subsequent persuasion and counselling both at the clinic and at the residence of patients. The results were compared with 'drop-out' in smear-positive cases registered at the same centre in 1989, 1990, 1992 and 1993. By introduction of the special measures, the 'drop-out' rate was significantly reduced from 52% (for other years) to 36% (1991). The expenses incurred for the successful recovery of 'drop-out prone' patients and ensuring regularity in drug intake was Rs. 659/- per patient. This study of 'drop-out' patient shows that there are three categories of the so-called drop-outs: (i) the false 'drop-outs' (51%): these patients get transfer as per their convenience to other leprosy centres or medical services (private practitioners or consultants) within the city (ii) drop-outs due to migration: the migration is forced on them due to some genuine reason, and (iii) persistent offenders: this is a group of adamant, non co-operative, or, distressed patients. For the first two category of patients it is advisable to introduce a good referral system. For the recalcitrant defaulters, supervised short-term drug therapy will probably be the best option.
1991年在孟买一个城市麻风病中心登记的119例涂片阳性麻风病病例被随访了三年,以研究他们的“失访”模式,并判断一些纠正措施对此的效用。这些措施包括绘制显示患者居住确切位置的地图、在登记日进行家访以及随后在诊所和患者住所进行劝说和咨询。结果与1989年、1990年、1992年和1993年在同一中心登记的涂片阳性病例的“失访”情况进行了比较。通过采取这些特殊措施,“失访”率从(其他年份的)52%显著降低至(1991年的)36%。为成功找回“易失访”患者并确保药物摄入规律所产生的费用为每位患者659卢比。这项对“失访”患者的研究表明,所谓的失访患者有三类:(i)假“失访”患者(51%):这些患者根据自身便利转至市内其他麻风病中心或医疗服务机构(私人执业医生或顾问);(ii)因迁移导致的失访:由于某些真实原因他们被迫迁移;(iii)顽固违规者:这是一群固执、不合作或痛苦的患者。对于前两类患者,建议引入良好的转诊系统。对于顽固的违约者,监督下的短期药物治疗可能是最佳选择。