Suppr超能文献

埃拉格 - 科隆自动血压记录仪。临床评估。

The Elag-Koln automatic blood pressure recorder. A clinical appraisal.

作者信息

Ramsay L E, Nicholls M G, Boyle P

出版信息

Br Heart J. 1977 Jul;39(7):795-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.39.7.795.

Abstract

The performance of an Elag-Koln semiautomatic blood pressure recorder was compared with the London School of Hygiene mercury sphygmomanometer in 24 subjects providing a wide range of blood pressure measurements. Readings with the two instruments correlated highly (for systole, r=0-99; for diastole phase 4, r=0-97; for diastole phase 5,r=0-98), and the slopes of the regressions did not differ significantly from unity. Elag-Koln measurements were higher for systole (mean difference 3-7 mmHg,P less than 0-001) and diastole phase 5 (mean difference 7-4 mmHg,P less than 0-001), but agreed closely with diastole phase 4 readings with the London School of Hygiene instrument. The Elag-Koln recorder tested was compact, easy to use, and had acceptable accuracy. This type of instrument deserves further testing to examine its suitability for general use.

摘要

在24名血压测量范围广泛的受试者中,将一款伊拉格 - 科隆半自动血压记录仪与伦敦卫生学院的汞柱式血压计的性能进行了比较。两种仪器的读数高度相关(收缩压,r = 0.99;舒张期第4阶段,r = 0.97;舒张期第5阶段,r = 0.98),回归斜率与1无显著差异。伊拉格 - 科隆血压计测量的收缩压(平均差异3.7 mmHg,P < 0.001)和舒张期第5阶段(平均差异7.4 mmHg,P < 0.001)更高,但与伦敦卫生学院仪器测量的舒张期第4阶段读数非常一致。所测试的伊拉格 - 科隆记录仪体积小巧、易于使用,且具有可接受的准确性。这类仪器值得进一步测试,以检验其在一般使用中的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91cb/483318/24ce23f8b581/brheartj00233-0098-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验