Lindberg M C, Sullivan G M
Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Conn. 06105, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Jul;11(7):397-400. doi: 10.1007/BF02600185.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of a geriatrics-focused acute medicine inpatient rotation and the presence or absence of a geriatrician as attending physician on knowledge about and attitudes toward older patients and the field of geriatrics.
Randomized trial.
A 4-week acute care inpatient internal medicine rotation at a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center; experiences included caring for acutely ill, older medical patients, interdisciplinary team meetings, geriatrics-based noon conferences, interaction with geriatrics-trained nurse practitioners, and a syllabus of readings on geriatric medicine.
Postgraduate year 1, 2, and 3 internal medicine residents were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) the intervention with a geriatrics-trained internist attending (n = 44); (2) the intervention with a non-geriatrics-trained internist attending (n = 25); or (3) no exposure to the intervention (n = 24).
Knowledge was assessed using a 35-item test. Attitudes were evaluated using a 24-item questionnaire.
There were no differences among the three groups of residents in pretest knowledge (p = .971, analysis of variance). There was a significant difference in the changes in scores from the pretest baseline among the three groups (group 1 = .030, group 2 = .051, group 3 = -.009; p = .039). Both groups assigned to the intervention showed significant improvement in knowledge (p = .011); the presence or absence of a geriatrics-trained attending physician did not alter the results. Resident attitude scores were generally positive and did not change after the intervention.
An intensive integrated acute medicine rotation in geriatrics improved residents' knowledge of geriatric medicine. The presence of a geriatrics-trained attending physician was not necessary for this improvement. Residents' attitudes toward geriatric medicine and their geriatrics education were generally positive and were not influenced by this experience.
本研究旨在评估以老年医学为重点的急性医学住院医师轮转以及是否有老年医学专家担任主治医师对有关老年患者的知识和态度以及老年医学领域的影响。
随机试验。
在一所大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心进行为期4周的急性护理内科住院医师轮转;经历包括照顾急性病老年内科患者、跨学科团队会议、以老年医学为基础的午间会议、与接受过老年医学培训的执业护士互动以及老年医学阅读资料大纲。
第一年、第二年和第三年的内科住院医师被随机分为三组:(1)由接受过老年医学培训的内科医生担任主治医师的干预组(n = 44);(2)由未接受过老年医学培训的内科医生担任主治医师的干预组(n = 25);或(3)未接受干预组(n = 24)。
使用一份35项的测试评估知识。使用一份24项的问卷评估态度。
三组住院医师在预测试知识方面无差异(p = 0.971,方差分析)。三组从预测试基线开始的分数变化存在显著差异(第1组 = 0.030,第2组 = 0.051,第3组 = -0.009;p = 0.039)。被分配到干预组的两组在知识方面均有显著改善(p = 0.011);是否有接受过老年医学培训的主治医师并未改变结果。住院医师的态度分数总体呈阳性,干预后未发生变化。
老年医学强化综合急性医学轮转提高了住院医师对老年医学的知识。这种改善并不需要有接受过老年医学培训的主治医师。住院医师对老年医学及其老年医学教育的态度总体呈阳性,且不受此经历影响。