Pearson A J, Harper N J, Pollard B J
University Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):694-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01709749.
To investigate the infusion requirements and recovery characteristics of cisatracurium compared with atracurium when both are administered by prolonged continuous infusion.
A prospective, randomised, single-blind study.
The Intensive Care Unit of the Manchester Royal Infirmary.
20 patients requiring a continuous infusion of a neuromuscular blocking agent to facilitate mechanical ventilation. 12 patients received cisatracurium and 8 received atracurium.
Cisatracurium or atracurium was administered by continuous infusion for a minimum of 24 h. The level of neuromuscular blockade was measured by recording the train-of-four responses using acceleromyography, the aim being to maintain 1-2 twitch responses of the adductor pollicis. At the end of the infusion period, the train-of-four was recorded until the ratio was greater than 0.7.
The mean infusion rate of cisatracurium was 0.23 mg kg-1 h-1, compared to 0.62 mg kg-1 h-1. No time-related increase in infusion requirements was seen for either drug. The mean recovery time to a train-of-four ratio greater than 0.7 was the same (46 min). There was no correlation between recovery time and age, duration of infusion or mean infusion rate.
Cisatracurium provides a satisfactory level of neuromuscular blockade in adult ICU patients at approximately one-third the infusion rate of atracurium and with a similar recovery time.
比较持续长时间输注顺式阿曲库铵和阿曲库铵时的输注需求量及恢复特点。
一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
曼彻斯特皇家医院重症监护病房。
20例需要持续输注神经肌肉阻滞剂以辅助机械通气的患者。12例接受顺式阿曲库铵,8例接受阿曲库铵。
持续输注顺式阿曲库铵或阿曲库铵至少24小时。使用加速度肌电图记录四个成串刺激反应来测量神经肌肉阻滞水平,目标是维持拇内收肌1 - 2个肌颤搐反应。在输注期结束时,记录四个成串刺激直至比值大于0.7。
顺式阿曲库铵的平均输注速率为0.23 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹,而阿曲库铵为0.62 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹。两种药物均未观察到与时间相关的输注需求量增加。四个成串刺激比值大于0.7时的平均恢复时间相同(46分钟)。恢复时间与年龄、输注持续时间或平均输注速率之间无相关性。
在成人重症监护病房患者中,顺式阿曲库铵以约为阿曲库铵三分之一的输注速率提供了令人满意的神经肌肉阻滞水平,且恢复时间相似。